[tamronben]

16-35 OR 17-35 邊支好D ar ?

[FreeMiLk]

咩叫好D，请解释。

[salonsip2005]

個人認為都係舊個D 好D , 雖然新有VR

[boot]

又係o個個問題!
究竟要2.8定要VR?!
o係wide鏡黎講,2.8永遠有用過VR!
再講,2.8o既景深同散景係f4永遠都俾唔到o既!

[OceanLight]

又係呢個問題......
睇你既用法啦
影景大家都一樣, 跟本唔會開咁大光圈
另一個用途就值得考慮
影人 17-35
影function 16-35

[fwan67]

VR not useful in such short focusing length. I think it is not difficult to have very clear image at fstop = 30 or even 25 at 17mm or even in low light.

[MineSky]

我未見過 17-35既底力…
只見過 16-35既 sample 相，我唔明點解咁多師兄讚佢好 sharp
F8都唔掂喎大佬…邊值呢個價
係 close up 相會唔錯…但影close up就無左 wide 既意思啦

我反而想知N記有無考慮過同C記一樣出枝16-35 2.8 黎upgrade 枝17-35

[tamronben]

17-35 除左係2.8 之外, 有無其他野好過16-35 ?

[OceanLight]

14-24 已經算係 17-35既2.8 version....
Nikon短期內都冇可能出17-35 2.8
除非要replace 14-24 2.8

[s3profan]

我都係用17-35 !
都想轉唔轉16-35 VR !