[ccydcf]

Nikon AF-S 16-85 f/3.5-5.6G ED VR vs Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4 Macro HSM OS

1) Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4 Macro HSM OS
2) Nikon AF-S 16-85 f/3.5-5.6G ED VR
小弟係唔同網站睇過兩支鏡既comments
兩支都各有好評
最後都係揀唔到
先唔好理價錢
想聽下各位ching比較呢兩支會點揀


若果有ching用過哂兩支鏡麻煩比比意見呀Nikon AF-S 16-85 f/3.5-5.6G ED VR vs Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4 Macro HSM OS
謝謝!

[tcl333]

Ching：
Nikon 16-85係好鏡一支，焦段通常夠用，就算我入左17-55都吾捨得放，因為方便，只係光圈细左D，但原廠就係原廠，17-55價錢貴左佢差吾多一倍，如果光線充足既話，影D相吾差17-55好多，室内同夜晚就吾駛講，肯定光圈大D會好D。
Sigma 17-70 HSM未用過，不能評，但舊款既17-70就用過,最麻烦就係走焦同甩皮，自此之後吾想用S記，用番原廠有保証一D。

以上只係小弟見解,勿喷！

[lawrencetang]

I used Nikon 16-85 before. It's a sharp lens! Nice color contrast and rendition. Focus is a little slow because only f/3.5-5.6 but I think this is the 2nd best DX lens behind the Nikon 17-55mm. I would recommend it. I now use my 17-55mm 95% of the time!

[cbsphoto]

I have tried Sigma 17-70mm in my D7000, it cannot produce sharp image. It is F2.8 only at 17mm. I am now using Nikon 16-85mm, it is better than the Sigma 17-70 though more expensive.

[hubertc]

why not consider Sigma 17-50 F2.8?