近日收到不少網友意見，指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站，此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論，並正密切留意事態的發展。
| 上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
| 作者 |
訊息 |
letni
註冊: 2004-09-27
上載我的肖像
|
 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 1 日 |
|
|
EF 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM 定
EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好?
EF 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM 輕便,
EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 又長焦距, 又係白鏡,
邊隻好d?
thx
|
|
|
|
 |
letni
註冊: 2004-09-27
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 1 日 |
|
|
|
定係Sigma AF 80-400mm F4.5-5.6 EX OS APO 好?
|
|
|
|
|
mike339
註冊: 2004-06-11
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 2 日 |
|
|
letni,
DO 鏡輕便,未用過,唔知,但應不錯.
白鏡,100-400mmIS USM, 好重,但採用塋石及UD鏡片,成像好,拍人像都好靚
有400mm 遠D都掂,我用緊.OK呀,不過重D, 大支D.
買邊支自己諗啦..
|
|
|
|
|
requicken
註冊: 2004-01-02
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 2 日 |
|
|
|
想問問100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 的推拉式變焦好唔好?
|
|
|
|
|
mike339
註冊: 2004-06-11
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 2 日 |
|
|
requicken,
習慣啦, 推拉變焦會快D,( 我覺得 )
|
|
|
|
|
requicken
註冊: 2004-01-02
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 2 日 |
|
|
|
mike339 兄, 推拉變焦的鏡頭會唔會好易 "冼"出? 因我正考慮買100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM, 因為係白鏡,且用料上盛,但它的推拉變焦令我覺又點怪
|
|
|
|
|
mike339
註冊: 2004-06-11
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 2 日 |
|
|
requicken,
佢有個環較鬆緊的,如果不需變焦時可 ling 緊D,亦可固定焦距,
初用會有D唔慣,用多D就 OK low,
|
|
|
|
|
requicken
註冊: 2004-01-02
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 2 日 |
|
|
|
師兄, 支鏡去到400mm 時, 係唔係比正常時長了好多?
|
|
|
|
|
kmasit
註冊: 2004-08-30
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 2 日 |
|
|
1)70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM 超輕便,成像不俗,比較貴!
2)100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 推拉變焦的(超級入塵王)聰明的你自然識點揀啦!
|
|
|
|
|
requicken
註冊: 2004-01-02
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 2 日 |
|
|
|
但係70-300mm do 個口徑較細,而且小人用, 比我揀我緊係揀100-400mm 拉! 話晒 L 鏡喎!加上用料仲好過70 - 200mm ga!
|
|
|
|
|
mike339
註冊: 2004-06-11
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 2 日 |
|
|
requicken,
長左成倍架.
|
|
|
|
|
requicken
註冊: 2004-01-02
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 2 日 |
|
|
嘩! 怪唔得叫大白la!
thank you mike339兄
|
|
|
|
|
letni
註冊: 2004-09-27
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 2 日 |
|
|
有冇人兄用過AF 80-400mm F4.5-5.6 EX OS APO呀?成像怎樣?係唔係對焦比EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 慢好多?
EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 唔係唔好, 不過比較貴, 我唔係太常用tele鏡, 只係想影荷花同打雀, AF 80-400mm F4.5-5.6 EX OS APO夠唔夠用呢?
推拉變焦易入塵, 入塵有咩影響? 影響成像定係影響變焦?
|
|
|
|
|
stevensh
註冊: 2004-05-04
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 2 日 |
|
|
|
我覺得入塵只會影響二手放出價錢........
|
|
|
|
|
patwong
註冊: 2002-06-02
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM定100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM 好? Post time: 10 月 2 日 |
|
|
According to some friends who used all three lens.
Quality: 100-400L > 80-400 > 70-300DO
IS: 80-400 > 70-300DO > 100-400L
If you want to have better quality, buy 100-400 or 80-400, seems not much different. (Since 70-300DO, from 200-300, the quality reduce quite a lot.)
If you want mobility, buy 70-300DO (light)
But one point is,
100-400L dust easily to go in.
AF speed seems 80-400 not fast.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
