[reno0205]

想問下呢3枝鏡既質數係點, 人人都叫窮人3寶, 質數係咪真係咁差呢,
配450d, 50d又有咩評價呢....
thzthz

[jovising]

我諗窮人呢2個字唔係解質數差呢...
3支我都有,成像唔錯,個人覺得性價比真係超高,暫時唯一我覺得麻煩係,出街要帶3支鏡,換鏡時怕塵,但我又覺得咁樣先似玩DSLR 嘿嘿^^

[shainye]

55-250系唔錯嘅鏡。。。都幾sharp下。。。我覺得對得起佢個價錢。。。

[Eddy310]

我想問, 即係邊3寶呀.. 因為我都係岩岩買左部DSLR..
而家有支EFS 17-85鏡.. 哩支係其中1寶??

[gary0720]

17-85 對初學來講, 絕對係一枝好鏡!

[Mcdullchan]

Gary0720,
Agreed, even I am a Canon man for a while, 17-85 is very good enough (even i have 17-40mm L,18-200mm, 55-250mm, 18-55mm).

Beside, a L Len (Red Ring) is a Canon man must have at least one no matter what (Cheap or expanisive one).

That is why i am planning to buy another L len 70-200mm.

[petercyc]

I've got Sigma, Tokina, Tamron etc. lens but only one Canon len ( Not L ).
So, I think I'm not a Canon Man. But it's so lucky that I'm not a Canon man. Otherwise......

[leolsliu]

叫抵買三寶可能會好d，有錢都可以買
EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5
EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

photozone認為EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS “nothing short of amazing. ”

http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/181-canon-ef-s-18-55mm-f35-56-is-test-report--review?start=2

There were a few moments when I considered not to publish the results due to "political correctness" because to date it was a quite absurd thought that such a cheap, or better "affordable", lens can perform this good and I'm sure that some will not believe the findings even though they're supported by the published field images. Anyway, the resolution capabilities of the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS is nothing short of amazing.

[gacktchow]

我想問450d是不是就是這個鏡頭？EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
都是有usm嗎？

[ivan0093]

三寶 是指
EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS
仲有邊支?

[wtfung]

性價比真係超高, 三寶 是指
EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS
EF 50mm f1.8
都幾sharp下, 絕對係好鏡

[calwkf]

窮人三寶這名字只係解價錢最平, 又可以玩到最大焦距.

其實呢三枝鏡既質數已呢個價錢都算唔錯, 但當然你要同 L 鏡比就差D啦.

[新蒲崗之虎]

窮人三寶我有齊哂啦.............暫時已經足夠我玩了