[TongYan]

請教各位師兄, 上述兩部相機用相同鏡頭 (假設50L)戶內或戶外影人像, 同樣有足夠自然光源, 那一部的PQ會比較好?

[ks chung]

不用多說!!! 5仔勝!!!

[talestar]

5仔 SURE WIN

[layer]

5仔win2條街

[wrx_ap]

5D

[HelloSRV]

I have both. 5D mark I sure win.

But for Iso over 800, 7D sure win.

[cy001]

科枝進步,別太相信,中古年代的中楷產品,可以好過現在的入門机.如果兩部選一部,一定要7D.畫質差不多,高IS0好過你中古機,為乜要想5D,除非是收藏佳能機的朋友.

[jsklee]

5D連拍慢

[onjo3]

5d, no doubt (if day light+ 人像 as u said)
5d can use ISO 50, 7d only 100.
FF detail layer is so good.
that s why so expensive for large format like pentax 645D.
but 5D ISO1600= 7d ISO 2500-3200 (NR on)
7D ISO much better.

i just sold my 7d but i still keeping 5d
will buy a extra 5d2.

but for macro or wilds, 7d should better for operating, strong in tele.
7d also good for video.

if new 5d still avaliable in market at 11000, sure it s big impact to 7d, 5d2 and D700, or even D7000.

[orabuln]

用黎影人，現場又夠光，5d贏硬啦！

[cy001]

5D is just like a disabled, it is only better using in day-time.

[王迦南]

1. 不同用途有不同要求，7D的連拍速度遠高於5D，情況絕非一面倒。
2. 可參考兩機的銷量，這是一個相當客觀的參考值。
3. 先搞清楚是5D還是5D II，兩者已經有很大分別。
4. 再搞清楚何謂PQ，似乎這裏用詞也不甚正確。

[lmichael]

不過其實日光日白, 低iso, 正常快門速度, 其實分別唔會好大. 其實......咁既情況, 用dc都分別唔大啦.

[TongYan]

多謝各位師兄的寶貴經驗和意見, 再次多 謝.