[nobody123]

技術高用50 1.2...好似marks ching啲 50 1.2相超正....
技術無甘高好似我甘就情願KEEP支S 50 1.4好啦....自已5天前第2次入手...之前用在7D上...今次用在5D2上...暫時都未有一張稍為滿意的相...自已技術問題....但以鏡論鏡50L只在乎1.2能給你更散的效果及鏡身手感矣....始終相差$7000...入枝SIGMA 85 1.4 會更有驚喜....

[Taihung007]

我都係技術未到家所以遲遲都唔敢入50L....:(
但係我唔太喜歡S50/F1.4, 不過完全係個人口味.
反而我很喜歡S85/F1.4.

[Obi-Wan]

josephinelim

post some photos ah!

I used C50/1.2, S50/1.4 & C50/1.4, now only keep C50/1.4

C50/1.2, the bokeh is nice, but it is the type of "Nisen Bokeh" that I hate much, so sold it after 1 week of usage

S50/1.4 was bought later, the creamy bokeh is very very nice looking, but due to back/front AF issue (especially on 5D2), I sold it after several months usage

C50/1.4 was bought many many years ago, still using, the bokeh is not as nice as Sigma & C1.2, but for daily usage, it is ok. It do not have not AF issue on my 5D2, 7D; have AF issue in 50D (but fixed micro adjust)

[Marksman01]

50/1.2L, PQ still the best in overall.

[h0001244]

The biggest problem of Sigma is the "back/front AF issue".........recently many ching said that they renewed the version, and has less complaint cases heard...............might be worth a try since it's only 1/3 in price of 50.2L