[Ref54]

對這個所謂"測試報告"很失望,似膳稿多於一切,無分析"黑點"問題,連失光調節功能對應邊款鏡頭都冇交待...充其量只可以話係"短測"或"試用後感"而已。

[hanny]

a normal test only

[lunar]

一個相機零售商的"測試報告"等同一個叫你買雷曼迷你債券的銀行職員

[Ref54]

"一個相機零售商的"測試報告"等同一個叫你買雷曼迷你債券的銀行職員 "

Good point.

[petercyc]

垃圾報告!

[buttli]

和大陸一樣..只報喜.. 不報死..
只給好一面你知..壞方面不提.

[Sam1983]

"一個相機零售商的"測試報告"等同一個叫你買雷曼迷你債券的銀行職員"

有咩問題???
這個就同超市一樣擺人地的商品俾你去買,你買唔買,都係你自己選擇......

由頭到尾,它只是一個invitation to treat......買唔買,你選擇,你買錯,你自負

佢冇講黑點問題,你唔俾個問題在做完湔試之後才出現的......

失光調節功能對應邊款鏡頭都冇交待這方面更是正確.....對應邊款鏡頭是因人而異,應該係因應自己的需要去探索才是,而不是公司老奉一定要俾你.....反正,個測試重點係部機本身,而不是鏡頭.....

如有投訴,詳閱: http://www.dcfever.com/documents/contactus.php

[bosschu]

可能本人讀新明系, 明白呢個市面上見得街既90%"產品簡介"都係鱔....
無咩大感覺...btw,點解我果部無咩黑點問題?係我開太式ISO睇唔到?

[lunar]

<<"一個相機零售商的"測試報告"等同一個叫你買雷曼迷你債券的銀行職員"

有咩問題???
這個就同超市一樣擺人地的商品俾你去買,你買唔買,都係你自己選擇......>>

咁即係在超市買左三聚氰氨奶0黎飲既人係抵乸死啦~~

[222222]

此事凸顯本地商店等的公信力，亦可能以此解釋為何大家都情願看外地的產品報告

[bidacone]

For a more reliable 5D Mark II的"測試報告" , I highly recomend u to visit Popular Photography magazine (USA ), especially on the lab test summary, usually on the last page of the report. For a detail report, u can buy that magazine in some major English bookstore in HK.

http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/5677/canon-eos-5d-mark-ii-test.html

They conduct objective tests for different camera bcoz. they have a independent team & lab, and their reputation is based on telling both the strength & weakness of different photographic items.

In HK, don't blame dcfever for their "測試報告"as they have to generate income to run the website. We should just select the information that may be acceptable to u. Don't be too serious with the local report anyway!

[Ref54]

想起在菲林機為主的年代,有數本幾專業的本地/外國攝影雜誌, 佢地嘅測試報告都不會只抄錄catalog有嘅資料再加幾張sample相就算數。更比較小寫那些"鱔"味這麼重嘅所謂"詳細測試報告"。作為所謂"最多人上嘅數碼機網站",我想佢地應該對相機性能有更深入嘅分析。

黑點嘅問題在第一批機出貨後(約12月頭)已開始有用家提出,而且越來越多用家遇到這個問題,最後Canon於本月19日出global announcement. 而Fever嘅報告於20日出。如果測試者有心的話,我不明白為何沒有在報告address這個問題。

關於失光調節功能,很小人提及現時不是所有EF lens都支援,如測試者有心的話,為什麼唔行多一步去講解?

可能我真係對Fever期望過高......算吧。

正如Fever鱔稿常用嘅結語: "XXX是否值得升級可謂見仁見智........。"

[lunar]

信測試不如自己上SHOWROOM試
不過~~~~世上還沒有一部完美的DSLR. 我明知雞能雞雞地都無奈地出了5D2, 鬼叫呢一刻我想上FF, 想上2000萬, 想玩高ISO咩~~~~只好包容一下佢D暗病啦 V_V", 唔好大病就得架啦(例如甩反光板AND走焦)

[Ref54]

"失光調節功能對應邊款鏡頭都冇交待這方面更是正確.....對應邊款鏡頭是因人而異,應該係因應自己的需要去探索才是,而不是公司老奉一定要俾你.....反正,個測試重點係部機本身,而不是鏡頭....."

Have you read Fever's report before comment? They said:

"...唯一是相機像素的增加，對於鏡頭的要求亦大為提高......只需利用周邊亮度修正（Peripheral Illumination Correction）功能，相機便會根據儲存的鏡頭校正資料以數碼方式修正邊緣失光"

They also aware that lens quality is very important for this 21mps FF model. So the testing theme is not just on the model itself, it also depends on which lens you're using. When the tester mentioned we can use "Peripheral Illumination Correction" to correct the leakage of light near corners, the tester just said "筆者便特別以廣角端失光頗算明顯的 EF 24-105mm f4.0L IS USM 開啟功能進行拍攝，發覺暗角基本已可大致消除" but he/she has not mentioned this function only works for few lens currently (the list is available in Canon website) until the next firmware update. Readers might presume that all EF lens works with that function.

As a 5DM2 user, Fever's report do no harm to me, but I think they should be more professional in writing this kind of "詳細測試報告".

[Sam1983]

咁即係在超市買左三聚氰氨奶0黎飲既人係抵乸死啦~~

正因為顧客買了之後都唔知道會有問題,因此零售商在責任的需要下都提供售後服務,反正零售商亦都唔知道d奶有三聚氰氨啦,係生產商揭發有問題時才去回收......

所以要追究的話,零售商不在此列.....

失光調節功能對應邊款鏡頭都係因應自己用邊隻鏡頭而決定......佢唔提對應邊隻鏡頭都不是咩問題

佢用EF 24-105mm f4.0L IS USM的鏡頭都只是一個對應例子......其重點都係部機對應鏡頭的能力係點而唔係鏡頭本身......

btw......

要投訴的份報告的,都係e去: http://www.dcfever.com/documents/contactus.php

你係度嘈咁多,人地都係聽不到的......