上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
SPKL
註冊: 2010-10-17
上載我的肖像
|
想入支長鏡,邊支好?? Post time: 3 月 21 日 |
|
|
本人用50d,有sigma 17-50 f2.8, canon 50 f1.8, canon 100l f2.8 marco
想入番支打雀打蝴蝶的長鏡
budget 1萬內
現在諗緊以下幾支是但一支,睇過小小文章,好似支支各有長短,請各位俾下意見
Canon 大白 (IS得2級,但輕而且白色型,不過始終L鏡,入門都算好sharp下)
Sigma APO 50-500 OS (OS4級,不過d人話廢廢地,好重,但range好正,一支攪掂,而且都好sharp下)
Sigma APO 150-500 OS (OS4級,成像焦段冇50-500好,又係好重不過平d)
Sigma APO 120-400 OS (有OS,成飲好過150-500,焦段又冇50-500好,價錢中間)
Canon 384 (IS得2級,定焦成像會好過以上的,輕同白色型,4光圈但焦段得300,可能仲要加1.4x,而且可能仲要買多支小小白is補上中距離的range)
Canon 456 (冇is,輕同白色型,定焦成像好,400叫做岩岩夠打雀,又係要買多支小小白is補range)
本人唔算好pro,唔算係聞相的人,之前都有玩過小白冇is,大家有咩意見???
|
|
|
|
 |
tupac128
註冊: 2009-07-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想入支長鏡,邊支好?? Post time: 3 月 21 日 |
|
|
Canon Big White.
I use it almost 3 years now and I'm loving it.
Long range and sharp for a tele Lens. IS 2 is not too much an issue and it is good enough for outdoor photos. Also, you usually use this Lens for outdoor day photos and even shooting concert.
Highly recommend this Lens.
|
|
|
|
 |
tupac128
註冊: 2009-07-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想入支長鏡,邊支好?? Post time: 3 月 21 日 |
|
|
Canon Big White.
I use it almost 3 years now and I'm loving it.
Long range and sharp for a tele Lens. IS 2 is not too much an issue and it is good enough for outdoor photos. Also, you usually use this Lens for outdoor day photos and even shooting concert.
Highly recommend this Lens.
|
|
|
|
 |
1aum946
註冊: 2008-08-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想入支長鏡,邊支好?? Post time: 3 月 21 日 |
|
|
仲有冇師兄可以講下???
|
|
|
|
 |
dcfandy
註冊: 2006-09-07
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想入支長鏡,邊支好?? Post time: 3 月 22 日 |
|
|
Sigma APO 50-500 OS 個range好正,一支攪掂,而且都好sharp下,朋友借用過.
Sigma APO 120-400 OS 支鏡唔得,我用過用腳架都唔sharp,畫質鬆散.
Canon 384 得好sharp下!
tamron 200-500mm 得好sharp下,但無防震,用腳架.
其他長鏡未用過.
|
|
|
|
 |
CHLEE1993
註冊: 2011-03-08
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想入支長鏡,邊支好?? Post time: 3 月 22 日 |
|
|
試過Sigma 150-500,發覺很照片鬆散,最後忍痛賣掉,買回一枝大白,影像質素及鏡頭用料都很滿意!(就此而已)
|
|
|
|
 |
terleung
註冊: 2007-03-28
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想入支長鏡,邊支好?? Post time: 3 月 22 日 |
|
|
Support Sigma 50-500 OS. I just bought this lens the week before to take wildlife photos, the lens is surprisingly sharp even at the widest aperture. It's a bit heavy at almost 2kg but it's still hand holdable. The 10X zoom range is very handy. I have the Sigma 17-50 f2.8 OS, so I only need to take the 17-50 and 50-500 to cover from wide to super tele. Considering the amazing zoom range of this lens and the image quality, I think the weight is justified. It is also relatively smaller than the 120-400 and 150-500 when it is fully retracted so I can still put this lens in my original camera backpack. The only down side is the slightly small max. aperture of f6.3 at 500mm but nowadays most camera sensors can provide good image quality even at high iso settings so it is not a serious problem.
I heard that with the new Kenko 1.4X DGX converter this lens is still AF enabled so it is possible to have a 112-1120 f6.3-8.8 set up with Canon APSC bodies. It is a totally workable set up if you shoot in day time.
If you are really into wildlife photography and have limited budget, this is a lens for you because it is always better to have longer focal length in one lens than a lens+converter combo. Considering all of the pros and cons, I should say that the price of this lens is quite reasonable.
|
|
|
|
 |
gilipiki
註冊: 2007-10-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想入支長鏡,邊支好?? Post time: 3 月 22 日 |
|
|
我之前都在這裏post過近似問題,要好應是小小白is+384+1.4X,可到以下連結參考一下ching的議見:
http://dcfever.com/forum/read.php?f=12&i=128634&t=128634&phorum_auth=5ade83caf419294cfc458576ebfe6f78
|
|
|
|
 |
homankop
註冊: 2009-06-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想入支長鏡,邊支好?? Post time: 3 月 23 日 |
|
|
384/100-400
|
|
|
|
 |
|