[alqua]

我而家用緊500D, 手上的50.8玩O左一年時間, 漸漸對畫質要求開始高,
想換個新O既50mm...
問題來了
而家選擇有原廠50.2L, S50.4
有諗過升上5dm2, 不過好可能等多幾個月或者一年o既事 (最近入o左百微... =.= 好窮)
50.2L 用o係500D會唔會係好浪費? 定係S50.4已經夠我玩呢?

兩者價錢相差甚遠, 但係又係咪代表50.2L可以比S50.4用得更長遠呢?
點好呢點好呢? >.<

[look_yau]

go for S50.4

[kenpoon830]

兩支我都用過, 雖然我sold 左支s50 f1.4 入左c50 f1.2L, 但sigma 基本上巳經好夠玩, 平靚正!!!~如冇原廠情意結就入s50 f1.4啦~~

[super159]

我都有呢個問題.
我2枝都試玩過, s50.4 色係sharp過c50.4
但有走焦情況(呢度d ching話可以去cs度整, 整完無問題), 同77mm濾鏡真係有d貴
如果你唔怕麻煩, 我建議入s50.4, 因為我都打算入返枝haha

[叮噹仔]

Re: super159

樓主講緊S50.4 定C50L

錢唔係問題就50L喇, 佢d發色係無可能係副廠鏡搵到,
S50 係好野, 不過唔可以同50L比~

[ozmaliu]

50L既色同散景真係好正, 我用過S50 1.4, 係SHARP但唔係我想要既色

[大口手手]

雖然同是50mm定焦，但兩個品牌的50mm明顯方向不同！
要Sharp的買S記！
要顏色／奶油味散景／虛榮的買C記！

[asmeowmeow]

Support 50L

[super159]

Re 叮噹
係喎, 睇漏眼tim..如果s50.4同C50L, 咁一定係C50L較好 (個人意見)

[MCCU]

俾多D 好少少 一定啦

[小小生]

係比多好多,但只係好少少-__-!
不過買鏡係咁架啦,如果要終極質素就要比多好多好多錢

[jaegerlecoultre]

i just tried both S50.4 and C50L in a portrait session.
C50L is much sharper if both lenses are compared wide open.

S50.4 is blurry until about F4.
a good zoom lens eg. sswis is much much sharper than S50.4 (comparison shots both at F4).
is it just my bad copy? but it is already my 2nd copy of S50.4, still so un-sharp! any comments from other ching please?

C50L is brilliant! worth to save some money for it.

[alqua]

看來我還是沉住氣, 儲儲錢等買50L...
其實本來是想等買5DM2一齊買... 因為500D用個咁貴O既L鏡總係未能發揮到最大... 最衰自己而家覺得支50.8唔夠喉... 見到CHING D毒相毒癮又要發作
一發作就O係度開topic!! XDD

[ericsanto]

可以同你講50L一定好過S50.4，個散景S50.4同C50.4都比唔到，值唔值就好睇個人，鍾意就覺得值，上網睇下50L既毒相先，如果毒到你咪即係表示50L係杯茶囉。

[APOII]

你睇下50L 晌二手區賣得幾痛苦，50.4夠用了