[nesta13]

小弟是一名新手, 因為A09唔夠wide 的關係, 近期想供一支比夠 wide 一些的鏡頭, 請比小小意見供 17-40mm F/4L ($230 x 24) 定 16-35mm F/2.8L II ($477 x 24) 好....

[Obi-Wan]

唔夠wide???

which body do u use?
5D or 1DsII => 17-40,
5D mark2 or 1DsIII => 16-35,
if other bodies, perhaps better consider 10-22EFS

[fish30d]

It also depends on what other lenses you have in your bag. If are going to have just one lens, then 17-40. If you have a 24-105 or something to cover the longer range and, if money is no object, go for 16-35, which will give you much better colours.

[nesta13]

I am using 40D

[watt5i]

because I'm from 17-40 jump to 16-35

[nesta13]

Brother, would you give me any comments?

[Obi-Wan]

40D buy 10-22EFS $4xxx wide enough for u!

[fungwailaam319]

17-40mm 啦。。
五千多少少，夠wide,色水ng錯，天亮影景F4光圈夠啦。。夜晚用腳架，或推高ISO都可以～～～
around HKD5000買紅圈，買wide，買景，個人認為足夠。。。～～
當然，如果錢不成問題，你又追求超完美質素，go for16-35mm咯。。。
但個人認為17-40mm已夠，水貨都系四千七左右，抵到爛，爛到抵～～
16-35mm比17-40mm貴足足一倍，多出來ge錢仲可以買多支鏡～～
10-22mm本人都用過，個wide shot真系好勁，好震撼，但變形都幾嚴重，同色水感覺無17-40gum靚，顏色無gum飽和，影景除左個view正之外，色水更加緊要～～
本人以上三支鏡都有，依家影景長用17-40mm～～

[rickwok]

用Aps，建議10-22mm

完全2個世界，17mm幾靚都係17mm，吾同玩法。

況且10-22mm完全吾失禮，變形少，黑角少，色靚。

睇下用家心得，好多ching贊。

17-40mm我覺得係L鏡心理居多，相同setting，2支鏡可謂無乜分別。

[orabuln]

10-22 d 星芒唔係幾得...

10-22


17-40

[Obi-Wan]

6 blades vs 7 blades, depends on 個人口味

both are ok for me, I left my 17-40 in the dry cabin after using the 10-22

[willmky]

If for 40D..........17-40mm = Luxury lens only but it cannot offer the ultra-wide for you and somehow you will feel regret unless you will upgrade to FF soon.

10-22mm = real ultra-wide that can bring you FF feel by 40D!!

[Obi-Wan]

yes, buy 10-22 lah