[mtricky_leung]

感覺於ISO調於400以上已有很多雜訊. 尤其光線不太充足時尤甚, (當時使用50mm 1.8, 光圈全開, style 選擇人像/風景). 但由是影bb, 所以不用閃燈. 請問各位有否方式可調校設定改善一下? 謝謝!!

[Obi-Wan]

may be u should (1) decrease the "saturation" "contrast" "sharpness". For me, the noise of 450D even @ 1600 is quite acceptable for enlargement up to 8*12"

[Xplore]

有相 Noise 部份相睇下?

[canonu]

let me be straight.. 400d or 450d .. iso over 400 is not acceptable to me.. but under 400 can still produce a very good image.. 400d is a good gear with low ISO...

[Xplore]

每人對所謂 Noise & 微粒接受程度唔同

Any Photo share of yr High noise picture?

[orabuln]

400D 800 以下都用得喎... 1600都唔係太難接受啫...

[canonu]

:) good image orabuln

[orabuln]

[orabuln]

thx

[canonu]

but just a little suggestion.. if really need a better ISO control..is worth to think upgrade to 50D.. i just upgraded it.. the ISO control is much better.. no offense....

[Xplore]

呢 D 嚴格叫做粗粒

好多單反都係咁架喎

或者上到 5D 級可能好 D

[Xplore]

粗粒尤其係黑色較明顯

[orabuln]

450d d noise 真係唔難頂...
iso800... 1855is 無閃... 其實樓主係咪聞相之人...

[mtricky_leung]

謝謝各位回應. 以下是一幅雜訊較多的相給各位參考. ISO只是400

http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/view.php?id=663005

[canonu]

雜訊又真係幾勁。。。