| 上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
| 作者 |
訊息 |
王迦南
註冊: 2007-06-10
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 長炮之抉擇 !!! 請幫幫手~~ Post time: 4 月 28 日 |
|
|
>> Sigma APO 120-400mm 慢到PK,不要考慮了
新款Sigma APO 120-400mm F4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM 與舊款 Sigma APO 80-400mm F4-5.6 DG OS並不相同,她內置超聲波馬達,應該不會太慢吧!
|
|
|
|
 |
fsyten
註冊: 2004-02-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 長炮之抉擇 !!! 請幫幫手~~ Post time: 4 月 29 日 |
|
|
我都係睇中sigma新鏡的優點
4級os 加 hsm,效果應該唔錯 !!!
|
|
|
|
 |
johnxlee
註冊: 2009-03-24
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 長炮之抉擇 !!! 請幫幫手~~ Post time: 5 月 2 日 |
|
|
新款Sigma APO 120-400mm F4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM:
快同Canon 100-400mm, as I have compared. You won't feel the difference btwn the two, but Canon is bit sharper.
|
|
|
|
 |
johnxlee
註冊: 2009-03-24
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 長炮之抉擇 !!! 請幫幫手~~ Post time: 5 月 2 日 |
|
|
here is my comparison with side by side -
I bought Sigma 120-400mm which is really good, but soon bought Cannon 100-400mm which turns out better. I decided to let 120-400mm go (http://www.dcfever.com/trading/view.php?itemID=309122).
Cannon 100-400mm, better lense, light, but very expensive
Sigma 120-400mm , very good lense, heavier, cheaper
Sigma 150-500mm, xxxxxx, very hearvier, and not that cheap.
I think you may make a decision based on your budget, convenience and the quality. If you do care about money, definitely go with Canon 100-400mm; if you have limited budget but want a good lense, go with Sigma 120-400mm; if you have some more beduget and don't care about weight, go with Sigma 150-500mm. I warn you - the third one is really heavy and, of course, not really "portable".
|
|
|
|
 |
Feverfriend
註冊: 2009-04-28
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 長炮之抉擇 !!! 請幫幫手~~ Post time: 5 月 4 日 |
|
|
|
Canon 100-400mm 用1.4X extender 不能用AF, 祗可用MF.
|
|
|
|
 |
alphanewnew
註冊: 2007-04-05
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 長炮之抉擇 !!! 請幫幫手~~ Post time: 5 月 5 日 |
|
|
各位師兄好 !
因我好多時間在Vancouver....所以揾咗長炮好耐..(地大 景多).近排睇鏡頭資料館有關--Sigma120-400mm & 150-500mm.啲評語和師兄啲相....都好掂 (我要求有限....子彈有限)........
亦有PM聯絡多位師兄...請教! 啲師兄好有善.....有相睇..有優点..亦有短處等等.......最後决定做嘢..打电話去定咗支150-500mm.(Cam 2 on sale:$5780
水貨+14個月保...ok啦! 因我太太呢個星期會由 HK 番過嚟...叫佢去攞.
我太太講:去攞鏡头時啲職員唔錯.攞埋部Canon比佢試....又教佢睇吓鏡頭入面有冇塵..有冇白点...服務態度有90分(我太太評).wan chai shop.
而幾位師兄比我對支鏡嘅平分係....以價論鏡....物超所值...
其中一位師兄Steve_lee真係好難得.同我多次pm講解有關150-500mm鏡.
他的宝貴經驗和時間........真係再講多次-------多謝哂!..
各位......以上係小弟愚見...愚見! 不彷去鏡头館間吓啲師兄...識多啲志同道合
嘅朋友.交換吓心得!
|
|
|
|
 |
mpcteddy
註冊: 2004-05-04
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 長炮之抉擇 !!! 請幫幫手~~ Post time: 5 月 6 日 |
|
|
|
100-400 la...
|
|
|
|
 |
h0001244
註冊: 2007-04-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 長炮之抉擇 !!! 請幫幫手~~ Post time: 5 月 13 日 |
|
|
Canon has 7 pins on camera body
On the 2x extension, there are 10 pins on lens side and the lens (100-400 or 70-200 2.8 also has 10 pins)
That extra 3 pins convert the data say 200-->400 & 2.8 -->5.6
I have a tokina 80-200 (10 yr old more) that does not have 10 pins but 7 pin. After I put it on Kenko 2X (10pins on lens side and 7 pins on camera side), exif shows 200 and 2.8 (actually already become 400 & 5.6).
I tried canon 70-200 2.8 on Kenko 2x, exif shows 400 and 5.6 (that's exact data, not like tokina)
Therefore you can fade the camera by taping that extra 3 pins on (100-400 or 70-200 )
I tried focusing tamron 18-200 on Kenko 2x, I couldn't get the focus even on bright sunny day. This is becos the actual light is so low at 200mm (5.6 become 11)
|
|
|
|
 |
cckjackie
註冊: 2008-06-13
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 長炮之抉擇 !!! 請幫幫手~~ Post time: 5 月 13 日 |
|
|
|
C hing 又唔一定wor 我剛買了一個2X 用2.8 冇問題 光圈變成5.6 但我試轉在24-105 f4 又用到wor 有AF 但就變f8
|
|
|
|
 |
h0001244
註冊: 2007-04-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 長炮之抉擇 !!! 請幫幫手~~ Post time: 5 月 14 日 |
|
|
竟然係咁,真係試過先知
即"That extra 3 pins convert the data say 200-->400 & 2.8 -->5.6" 未必正確得晒
Also want to share this.....
50 1.8 + Kenko 2X not working all the time, maybe my lens contact is not good.
cckjackie, are you using kenko 2x ??
|
|
|
|
 |
ken61680
註冊: 2007-12-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 長炮之抉擇 !!! 請幫幫手~~ Post time: 5 月 14 日 |
|
|
http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/view.php?id=692556
希望幫到你
|
|
|
|
 |
ken61680
註冊: 2007-12-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 長炮之抉擇 !!! 請幫幫手~~ Post time: 5 月 14 日 |
|
|
|
f8 影架, 夜晚係戲棚影, 你還要考慮一下86mm filter吾平, 而且吾係度度有, 我都係買返sigma = hkd6xx at 肥花
|
|
|
|
 |
jsklee
註冊: 2002-10-16
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 長炮之抉擇 !!! 請幫幫手~~ Post time: 5 月 15 日 |
|
|
|
86mm CPL Hoya UV(0) is about $700.
|
|
|
|
 |
| |