[yoyo726]

我看過很多書和網友意見....都說買canon f 2.8 17-55 is比較好些..但個價錢真系差不多...質數兩者都應該唔會相差太遠下話.....有沒有c兄用緊....比d意見支持下啦....thanks

[Taikin]

10~22 + 24~105

[goldfish0606]

唔上FF就EF-S 17-55/2.8 IS 啦.....

好似我老友咁 , 用緊500D , 不過佢講遲多兩年好大機會直上FF , 所以唔會再買EF-S 或DX鏡......

[tomy33]

2.8光圈同17-23或56-105焦距係咪CHING想要既功能. 最好都係試清楚, 其他人比既只係意見, 買邊支都係CHING自己既決定.

[正字]

唔計PQ, 只計焦距,

11-22 = 16-35
17-55 = 24-70
15-85 = 24-105

[火Ken]

我以前用40D時用，Canon 10-22 + Tokina 16-50 f/2.8 幾好！
現在我叫朋友用Tokina 12-24來取替Canon 10-22[ 因太貴 ]..............呢個配合ok Good 嫁！！

[orabuln]

緊係唔配啦... 24-70 o岩 d...

[cy001]

Maybe u will have APS-C and FF, Don't worry EFS. I will buy 17-55 f2.8 instead of 24-105.

[tomylfc]

我都用緊450d+ef 24-70啦！
因為我之後會上ff，只係覺得24唔夠wide啫！

[hunter1437513]

我都係用緊500D 同24~105!,其實都冇話配唔配既,最緊要知道自己想要咩咪得囉!更何況其實24MM(FF)都唔係好WIDE吖!我自己都仲有支S 10~20 3.5,再乘1.6都係16MM啫~如果一支鏡可以有哂咁多功能,我諗到時都冇乜人會再買鏡LU~係咪^^
希望會幫到師兄啦!!!!
預祝各位師兄:新年快樂^^

[phywmche]

我正是呢個500D + 24-105 組合,我同阿女係屋企同戶外影相多, 唔只唔夠WIDE, 影大特寫要離遠少少先影到. 不過相質素真係無得彈. 去海洋公園ZOOM 阿女玩遊戲真係幾正.

[homankop]

24-105 is better than 17-55

[kelvinshum]

24-105 要加 10-22咁就正啦！

[gogogo939]

我覺得最重要係你知道自己最常用係那裡．．．還有自己鍾意就得哪．．．

[flieger]

phywmche ching,
我對 24-105 都有興趣，不過想請問你在室內影囡囡時有無需要用閃？我怕F4唔夠用