[698]

呢兩部我都有~

D700好~

[698]

NIKON 個 tone 立體(3D)啲, 透明啲~

像素1200萬肯定夠用有突, 色水同操控一試難忘!! 我仲諗緊好唔好放晒Canon啲嘢~

[Kenre]

視乎影你要影乜野多D, 兩廠取向唔同。

影人, 女像, 靚膚色, 應懞就懞, Canon 強項。

影product, 風景, 著重質感, NIKON 強項。
P.S. 窮人三寶支定焦真係強, $1000 以下貨色無話可說。

[william_lau]

樓主，想知實際輸出效果如何有幾難？ 上網真係大把。 :-)

[rankinelo]

698 CHing, so sad that u leave C finally... The lens in C cannot make u stay as u said before...

[698]

玩HDR相就買NIKON啦, 包圍曝光級數多過Canon, 彈性好多.

[colorbee]

我認為客觀上沒有最好的相機，只有最適合你的相機。別人的意見只能作參考，最好還是向朋友借來試一試，看看那一部較能令你得心應手。

[wllui]

死都要找出兩部器材邊部好
我覺得要挑骨頭, 兩部都唔好
直上d3s/d3x, 不要浪費時間多想
想多d更有意義的事

[SunnyDevil]

D700 la

[bzboy]

D700 is good to use.

[Obi-Wan]

My friend has D700+24-120VR, I have 5D2+24-105IS
The pictures from D700+24-120VR really SUCK when compare with 5D2+24-105IS!

If u invest on NIKON, u have to prepare to pay MORE on the lens which have similar functionality & picture quality as CANON.

So far no NIKON lenses can compete with the price AND picture quality of
CANON 17-40/f4L, 70-200/f4IS, 100-400 etc.

Also if u want to shoot telephoto, u better invest on CANON, there are far more good quality telephoto choices than NIKON.

If u invest on NIKON, even if u have $, they always have no stock in HK

(I have both NIKON & CANON systems)

[HL_LAI]

Thank you everybody

[dhcp255]

睇個人需要，如果唔需要高像素而對對焦同測光系統要求高，兩者間毫無疑問選D700, 當然仲要考慮埋鏡頭。如果喺定焦躉，Nikon可能差一截。變焦就無乜所謂，大三元基本夠玩。

[Marksman01]

No subjective here, see DxOMark score (who favoite Nikon), except Nikon D3x, all Nikon picture quality cannot even compete with Sony.

[Marksman01]

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/en/Lens-with-Camera/Lens-rankings/Optical-Metric-Scores