[onlyken]

Canon 已正式發報 5D Mark-II, 其規格比D700要高, 但List price 則相當接近D700 的市場價; 大家估計會否出現新一輪的減價戰或者Nikon會有什麼對策?

小弟覺得增加像素,在一般用途, 已沒太大意義(專業搵食要出海報大小的相片者/ 或常要裁相者例外), 所以會著眼看其他features....

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08091705canon_5dmarkII.asp
http://cweb.canon.jp/newsrelease/2008-09/pr-eos5dmk2.html

[pkpartner]

正路咪減價應戰 S & C雙龍出海喎
一條龍減十個兩條龍減十五個回落去18xxx甘上下
或者整合D700+MB10+24-70一條龍買大飽 29xxx囉
hahaha甘我呢D咪得米囉

[Obi-Wan]

higher mega pixels have the unique advantage for better CROPPING picture

[onlyken]

Obi-Wan 兄, 咪寫左囉 ==> (專業搵食要出海報大小的相片者/ 或常要裁相者例外)

[pkpartner]

出幾大張海布先 21M 出黎掛大廈呀
我連30吋都未晒過
反而D700 8fps黎得有用好似影下郭晶晶跳水甘就夠好啦

[B and H]

如果淨係電腦睇相, 我真係睇唔出6M像素和0M像素既分別 ^_^

[B and H]

5D Mark2 有 hd video, 唔知nikon幾時有

[pkpartner]

我估無甘快.....以下純粹斷估 下一部發表應該係D3x 24M 5fps 呢D係外國吹既風 我估無video拍 呢D花巧嘢應該暫時唔會擺落旗艦型號 先用D90食頭圍得既話最多跟手得就出D700s+個video分唇佢拍高清 唔成功就按兵不動
.....呢個似...似我發開口夢

[onlyken]

其實用單鏡機影video, 一定唔會係主流, 單鏡機無論係內在,外在既設計上, 都唔係用來影video的, 單係講重量, 同手揸位既設計, 都冇可能長時間拿住它來拍野, 單鏡機要雙手操作, DV機單手搞惦, 又輕又方便, 所以依個funtion係唔應該起旗艦級單鏡機上出現(重量係其中一個問題), 甚至有人講, 依d花巧功能會整Cheap 晒部單鏡機. 所以甚麼D3x, D4....甚至D800較旗艦的型號, 都係唔應該加此功能的!

[hanny]

yes

i feel 影video整Cheap 晒部單鏡機

also liew view is the same

it make dslr not a dslr

[B and H]

但係我覺得有video幾好, 雖然單鏡機無論係內在,外在既設計上, 都唔係用來影video的, 但總好過我一部相機加Video Cam. 有時去旅行帶兩部相機, 一部用wide鏡, 一部用normal range, 再來一部Video Cam, 真係handle唔到, 同時一部相機加一部Video Cam點都重過單一相機with video function掛. ^_^

[hanny]

of cos
have better than no have

is it ?

[onlyken]

This is the main point, "Only better than nothing."

[louis277]

Higher resolution take advantage not only in crop, but also in telephoto and macro, color is much richer and more detail texture as well.

If you compare 1Ds mark III and 5D image in telephoto and macro, you can find a lot of different. The weakness point of 5D mark II is the AF system...., other than that, 5D mark II is a good choice for me, at least less than half price compare with 1Ds mark III....

[zaku888]

5D Mark2 beats D700 , D700 no HD video function , same price as 5D Mark2 .... Canon wins !