[s3profan]

TAMRON 90MM 同NIKON 105MM VR 邊支好?

QUILITY 邊支好D ?
想入一支MICRO 鏡~

[ringomov]

 梗係 105 vr la !正好多...

[s3profan]

真係差好遠? 想平入ja ~

105vr = 兩支90mm 龍仔的price !

想知quility 影出來有d 咩分別ar !

[ringomov]

龍仔至命傷係對焦慢聲音燥冇防震,但光學質素不錯.

[隨意隨心]

對新手來說,
兩支都咁好,
當然, 邊支平咪買邊支囉!
反正對於新手分別唔大.

我睇書都有講105VR呢支成像銳利,
但個價錢就偏貴(大約Over $7,000), 始終原廠鏡一定係咁!

[wicky276]

nikon 105 $ 5980 made in china
Most second hand price about $5300 made in japan (change making
factory location about 1 year fm Japan to China)

[威力啤酒]

對焦慢 對焦嘈 冇防震

呢D都係新手們一般會注意o既地方

無錯對焦慢係致命傷 但都要睇咩鏡

長距離攝影對焦慢就一定唔洗玩 所以我成日話N55300搵笨

短鏡對焦慢問題其實都唔太緊要 大把神人用緊1855識飛咁厲害

大佬你而加Macro鏡wo......我自己渣住支百微連會唔會用自動對焦都成問題

慢？嘈？我把口就真係嘈喇，多野講o既人呢點真係致命傷

防震...好多人覺得防震大於一切，不過你咁認為o既其實都冇乜大問題o既

正如有人食漢堡包走青走菜走汁走史，只需要塊肉就ok一樣......

[威力啤酒]

>TAMRON 90MM 同NIKON 105MM VR 邊支好?

就以呢個問題而言

梗係N105Macro好啦xd

[HU162]

講質素應該都係N105VR啦
其實兩支又差得唔算遠(成像)

不過，係咪值得比多一倍錢買配料(AFS+VR)就你要諗。

微距9成玩手動，AFS其實可以當佢冇到
反而微距VR都幾重要下

[ssannwong]

重點問題冇人問....

"係唔係成日影微距? 對微距要求幾高?"

如果唔係成日影, 要求又唔高, 小弟我係唔捨得特登買1:1微距鏡長用, 所以我去花展都用24-85/2.8-4.0D, 用1:2微距算, 有需要又可以zoom返出來影景方便唔駛換鏡

想玩下微距一嚐1:1滋味, 買二手玩完放返二手都好, 係咁就不如玩靚d功能强d既N105 VR好

[真丹尼爾]

"大佬你而加Macro鏡wo......我自己渣住支百微連會唔會用自動對焦都成問題

慢？嘈？我把口就真係嘈喇，多野講o既人呢點真係致命傷"

睇下影乜，AF我會常用，慢好多時追唔切，係
句，有budget就N105，無既就龍仔T90！

[winnwong]

NIKON 105VR 一步到位, 只是爭3k咗喎, 儲多陣錢囉, 買鏡...隨非等住用, 否則慢慢來囉.

一用包你愛上佢

建議你買二手日本鏡...家陣啲街貨, 的確係6千蚊樓下, 但中國造, 兼好多dust, 我睇咗7, 8 枝都買唔落手,

最近卻執了枝二手, 好正, 好似新的一樣

[ringomov]

我唔用原廠都讚呢支105vr低用。

[stephen.pit]

nikon 105 gives u super quality, of course VR is v useful for macro object even though you have tripod.

one important point is the second hard value, nikon lens has much higher 2nd hand value plus easier to sell in the future.

it is kind of investment too, you have better lens to give u better pics, then can sell it in the future.(keep the whole packing remember)

I bought a 105 in 2006 and still using it, love it, pics are so sharp, even better than my 24-70 or 70-200 VRII.
but carl zesis is even better,......different feel.