[kcrgbkin]

本人下星期想買D700請問各師兄配N24-85 or S24-70 2.8好呢! 定係另外有好的配搭呢?
我現在用緊d50 s17-70 s70-300 呢2支平鏡,基本上我咩都喜愛影,人像，小朋友,狗狗，花,鳥.
因為錢有限$25000之內.

各位師兄請比小小意見給小弟 謝謝各位.

[水上小白龍]

我自己都系用緊 D700配24-85, 好實用, 基本上我用F4已經恆定, D700 iso又ok, 我都有念過S24-70, 睇過報告都ok既, 不過都系怕有走焦問題就出N記

[flymousetw]

N24-120 ,
FX 就要配好鏡

[kcrgbkin]

多謝 師兄意見.

[ssannwong]

With 25K money you want to buy both D700 & lens, don't you?

By limited capital, you better think of N24-85 instead. It has marco ability with cheaper cost than S24-70/2.8

Other option is Tamron 28-75/2.8 in same range, save you more money for one more lens

For convenience, You can invest more for N28-300 VR. With VR I think it has better PQ rate than N24-85.

[kcrgbkin]

n24-120會超出我能力.
我$25000連買D700在內，所以這支沒有希望。

[pigpig2000]

二手n28-105 macro
重有淨錢買燈 ^_^

[PP518]

D700 + N28-300 VR ^^'

[fathoz]

S24-70 絕對係好選擇

N24-85 業餘性質冇問題, 因為佢最大問題係打橫影直線會變形..如果唔係搵食, 咪OK囉, 又有MARCO送

兩支我都用過, 二揀一我會揀死馬24-70

24-120VR 不推薦, 性價比不相付

[ssannwong]

Personally I don't like S24-70/2.8.

No doubt on its quality, but only the 82mm filter S2470 using is not common as Nikon normal size 77mm.

Too many good choices if consider 2-hand lenses like n28-105 macro. N28-80G ($400-$600) or N28-200G (under $2000 - slow focusing) has very excellent PQ rate also ^^

Top recommendation still the 28-300 VR~

[fathoz]

S24-70既質素真係好既, 係82mm 搵filter 就貴d囉, 不過除左CPL / ND既姐, UV根本都冇用既, 買黎都係SIDE自己錢...

新個支天涯係質素不俗亦好方便, 不過...若果追求質素既話, 就都係正正經經搵番標準RANGE 會好D..

[kcrgbkin]

多謝咁多位師兄意見,我知道我要邊杯茶喇 THX各位.

[salonsip2005]

24-85 比較好, 實用, 而且個人認為上一代0既鏡雖然色彩還原係差D 但解析力高過依家D 鏡王, 因為個人兩支鏡都有, 自已用開24-85 真係拍得住鏡王同實用D

[aq9983]

x2

[marisalwy]

24-85 比較好, 實用, 而且個人認為上一代0既鏡雖然色彩還原係差D 但解析力高過依家D 鏡王, 因為個人兩支鏡都有, 自已用開24-85 真係拍得住鏡王同實用D

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Salonsip, do you mean N24-85 versus N24-70?