[ahtarn]

各位師兄師姐好,
本人是窮人兼新手(雖然已入左部d90一年有多, 不過好少影..)
之前其實已經想入晒3支窮人三寶
不過諗深一層, 又唔係成日去打雀/蝶
所以入左支50.8之後就一直冇諗去入埋支70-300
因為近日多左機會, 亦都想再好好利用部d90, 所以諗住入埋支70-300
不過今日先岩岩發現原來已經停左產
想問下各位, 平既遠攝鏡除左上述果支之外仲有冇介紹?
我buget真的不多...$1000以下..有嗎
其實副廠都沒問題

謝謝大家賜教 !

[pierokwong]

ahtarn,

Hope you are enjoying your camera and giving the D90 some good workout.

Photography is not about the equipment you are using.

D90 with 50.8 will give you AMAZING shots if you know how to use them. If I didn't tell you, you won't believe some of my works are from a 50.8 as well.

Try to practice more with this combo and you will improve your skill. At the end of the day you will know exactly what you need in the gears.

Don't spend the money for just want more gears.

Equipment won't give you an instant good photos.

Cheers,
Piero

[mhinchu]

Agree, you can take good photo with your 50 1.8.......
what kind of topic you want to take so that you need to buy the 70-300..?

If you just want to buy a low price tele zoom, 70-300G still availabile and with autofocus in your D90...............

Also nikon hv :
55-300 DX
70-300 VR
80-200 AFD
80-400 VR
70-200 VRII
200-400........................

[whispermakers]

如果係諗住打雀用, 738都唔係好夠tele.
你講停產果支係d鏡, g鏡有支冇vr既仲賣緊, 應該唔駛$1000.
早兩日嚮成成仲見有, 不過冇問價.
講真句, 打雀係高銷費娛樂, 當然平平地玩下738都可以, 但要認真少少入場費都要384+1.7x都成皮野, 再認真d講緊都係皮皮聲.
我已經半放棄狀態~~~~

[FreeMiLk]

Agreed with whispermaker …
而且仲要返部咁上下嘅body...好踩我唔好嗰味野…如果唔係一路睇人地d大炮出嘅相，好易太high……都時條樓都唔掂……

[ahtarn]

pierokwong:

多謝你既意見呀
我都明白影相唔係玩器材
所以之前真係冇咩機會用到, 都冇諗長攝鏡
我自己本身都好中意支50.8
當然我唔會好似影得師兄你咁好啦, 不過我會盡量練習多D
唔好等佢無用武之地 !

mhinchu:

我想要入支tele zoom其實冇咩特別TOPIC
不過有時個目標係比較遠既距離, 而自己又無法走到好近去影
而又想影D close up, 所以先諗住入支tele zoom
謝謝你的Suggestions !

whispermakers:
嗯..其實我都未有打算去打雀/蝶
因為技術未夠, 而且暫時興趣不在此
亦知自己既金錢未afford到
我都係打算影D遠距離既目標 (人呀..動物呀咁)

FreeMiLk:
哈哈, 師兄說我太對了..
好彩我都唔好果味野
唔係賣血都唔掂呀 !!

[春田花]

一點意見，
攝影本身就是一項花錢的玩意，當你仍然在探索求知，不斷購入和轉換鏡頭是必然經歷的正常事，當你用開35-70mm，然後買了支80-200mm或一支24mm，你會發覺天外有天，進入另一個國度一樣，創作靈感由此而來。曾幾何時，我為了一部Sony Walkman而死慳死抵數月，又曾經花了一整筆暑期工的工資，買了一排正片拍Alan Tam演唱會。你專注於一個事情，總會有得也有失的，回想可能發覺好戇居，但係又好回味，這是人生必經之rock'n roll，是生命中一種不可缺少既元素。

[swchan07]

可以考慮：
Nikon 70-210mm f/4-5.6 AF-D

[pierokwong]

Try to show you a quick sample of what the 50.8 can achieve.



This is taken in one of my recent wedding.

It's very important for you to learn from the equipments that you already have. Try to fully expose the potential out of it. and then you will slowly find out what is that short of, and you will understand what is your need but not what just "want".

Totally agree with shooting bird is an expensive hobby. About tele lens, it's always "you get what you've paid". You will see amazing photos from great lenses.

If you start with lower end lenses, you will never get the similar sort of quality photos from expensive tele. There you go onto the path of spending lots and lots of money on lenses.

Unless you are 200% sure you wanna develop some sort of skill (potential money making skill) on tele wild life photo, otherwise be caution when you spend that much money just for a "Hobby".

It will become very expensive if the lens just sit there and have no use.

Also consider are you prepared to bring out all those heavy lenses with you all the time.

Cheers,
Piero

[ahtarn]

春田花:

多謝你既意見!
好明白人有時係要傻下, 人生先不枉過
不過因為實在是太窮, 所以唔敢比自己太放肆
唯有係依個高消費既興趣底下掙扎一番

d2°c

一個字都冇中呀..哈
不過會再接再厲'

swchan07:

請問依支鏡大概幾錢左右??

pierokwong

因為黎緊我將會出國一年
所以帶住一機3鏡都係我考慮既其中一個因素
其實諗諗下我可以真係會放棄入tele zoom
因為本身支kit len 同 50.8 已經好夠用
我亦都未真正發揮到佢地既功能出黎
做人唔可以太貪心, 咩都諗住要影到
我應該focus係其中一兩項先再去諗其他
不過就算最終唔會貫多支鏡都好
聽君一席話令我獲益不少呀!
謝謝

[pierokwong]

ahtarn,

You know what, coz I start from low end as well.

I went through the stages of not satisfying with the gear I was using.

But I realise in the early stage that what is my real need. That's why I save you to go straight into the top end lenses.

It's not a good idea to stuck with the mid-range lenses unless you can promise yourself you won't get tempt to buy the best. Otherwise you are eventually spending more (wasting more) based on the upgrade.

Mid-range lens doesn't worth too much money in 2nd hand market. High end lens always keep the resale value. So this is something to consider as well.

If you have lots of mid-range lens and move to high end, you will lost lot of money on upgrading this way.

heheee, because I am not rich, that's why I buy the best lens =p Hope you get what I mean.

Cheers,
Piero

[ahtarn]

pierokwong:

thanks Piero, totally understood what you mean !
i can't afford to buy the high end lens right now, nor consider to buy the low/mid-range one.
will review my skills & equipment when i back to HK a year later ~

[pierokwong]

add oil ar!!!

show us more photos =D

Piero

[marisalwy]

Consumer grade lenses OK, not necessarily those so-called "professional"

(We don't aim for re-sale)

[swchan07]

70-210 f4-5.6
二手價視乎新舊程度，約1000-2000之間。
支鏡好sharp，我都經常用，由菲林機用都現在D700，用了成十幾年啦。
詳情可參考：
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/7021056.htm