[Photoessay]

怪俠

你跟50363415 以後有更多蟲蟲交流的機會

[kingkonghk]

那要呼籲所有攝影者不要影微距了，因九成都要加閃才會有比較好的成像。
===========================================

50363415, 用2手煙來講唔太合理, 最起碼人唔鍾意可以講, 虫仔唔識講, 朕只係盡舉手之勞呼籲下

我同你掉轉, 無論用DC, 手機, 大機, 95%或以上影虫唔開閃燈

[50363415]

Using 2nd hand is very suitable to describe some situations. The one(s) who like(s) to smoke suddenly in a statutory permitted area, but it is really affecting very much to others in the vicinity due to the smoke created by him is uncontrollably flowing to non-smoker(s). His aggressive and impolite behaviour is also reflected that he is very rude on repeatedly imposing his own subjective and stubborn concept to others and never know what his nuisance is quite annoyance to others.

[pongyee]

king sir, 我仍然認為閃燈對蟲蟲的影響甚微。推論是蟲蟲並沒有眼皮保護，在烈日下活動了幾億年，那相對微弱的閃光不足以構成損害。

[kingkonghk]

生物學冇研究, 個人認為唔係人人都俾人近距離兜口兜面閃都當冇野(人類臘腸)

[DCVlEW2007_]

50363415 仲未講加左乜野影微距？

[pongyee]

>> 生物學冇研究, 個人認為唔係人人都俾人近距離兜口兜面閃都當冇野(人類臘腸)


咁即係假設蟲蟲有情緒？

咁任何情況下都唔用得閃燈咯，因為空氣中有很多微生物。XD
　

[kingkonghk]

朕5g微生物有冇視覺, 如果有的話都應該奶野

最起碼蟲仔係見到摸到， 打雀都好多人主張唔用閃

個人就盡量少用， 同埋呼籲下影友

[pongyee]

Joan Ramon Mendo Escoda , Feb 23, 2004; 08:25 p.m.

Insect response to flashes

The possible harm would take place depending on the distance from the light source, its intensity and its duration. Most of light sources emmit IR radiation and this would be responsible of a burn sensation on skin temperature receptors of the insect. Try to put your hand very tight to a flash (be careful) and you may probably feel a short but intense "burn sensation". I don't mean that flash "fries" the insect, but what I mean is that whenever the insect is too close to the flash, can feel some kind of instant warming. This would be a reasonable explanation of scaring in some cases. Intense or continued flash lightening may cause some degree of dehidration or drying on insect skin tissues.

Another explanation of getting scared from light flashes would be a "surprise effect", only dangerous if the insect suffers from heart disease (joke). During a storm thousands of insects are amazed by nearer rays, but milion years of evolution have made insects to be used to those natural flashes. Thus a nocturnal photograpic flash would have the same effect on them (insignificant).

That's what I think about it (regrets for any language mistake, regards from Spain).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

只找到一個相關的討論，詳見 http://photo.net/nature-photography-forum/005pkD?start=10

當然，我貼的是和我意見差不多的其中一個回應。
　

[kingkonghk]

人有人拳對蟲仔閃， 亦可以因應個人喜好盡量避免

閃唔係飯法， 冇所謂

[kingkonghk]

朕都試過can區fxxk眼討論題呼籲過， 反應都係同e+差唔多

又有向其他科林呼籲， 都係一樣

[pongyee]

因為個個都唔覺閃燈對蟲蟲有害，所以king sir 你以後可以慳返啖氣。

[50363415]

>DCVlEW2007
I re-post below links for your reference:

試試查看以下FLICKR用家的相片，我都是問他才識用HS10+MACRO LENS 及TC的。http://www.flickr.com/photos/tedsla/

MACRO LENS是RAYNOX (http://raynox.co.jp/english/digital/pdf/FUJIFILM_FinePix_HS20EXR.pdf)

有位THAI師兄用HS10 + SONY VCL-M3358 CLOSE UP LENS也有好的PERFORMANCE --- http://500px.com/photo/2261798

I am using Raynox 250, I think Raynox 202 or even 505 will be much terrible in formation of photo. Critical technique is taking photo under MF without turning the MF ring (instruction listed on the package of Raynox). U must to think how to take photo in focusing target under this condition.


>pongyee

Thanks You about the balancing work in this Forum. ^.^

Wishing you have a Happy and Fruitful Year of Dragon!

[Photoessay]

[DCVlEW2007_]

俾個like 你