Sony SAL1680Z Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* DT 16-80mm F3.5-4.5 ZA（已停產）

實拍照片

- Good Daily use Range
- Super Sharp! F4.5 - F 5.6 So sharp can cut your eye j/king
- Reasonable price for Zeiss lens
- T* is the king!
- Decent Auto Focus Speed
- With A55 best buddy for photo and video
- 85% of time on my A55
- Not too heavy
- Good second hand value. First hand 4.5k, second hand can sell 3.7k

- The tube can get loose after normal use and will fall slowly when you are carry the camera
- The aperture changes too fast, 3.5F is only on 16mm...
- No SSM
- No Weather Sealing
- Is APS-C only cannot bring it to FF :(
- You will get addicted to Zeiss

I use A55, this is my 4th lens. I brought 2 kits lens: 1. DT 18-55 2. DT 50-200 3. 50/1.4. After using this all my Kit lens I feel is rubbish. Even my 50/1.4 I feel a little unsatisfied because I love the sharp and color the Zeiss lens give me. Don't buy it if you don't want to be addicted. But if you don't buy Zeiss Lens, then why use Sony DSLR lei... use Canon or Nikon better la. You will get every single dollar you pay for if you get this lens. Being number 1 lens in DCFEVER cannot be false gei!

Sharp.
Great colours.
Zeiss lens, looks and feels good.
good range.

Lens quality vary, i exchanged 3 times and only the final copy of the lens is what i expect a Zeiss lens should be.
Black coners at 16mm.

Sharp, very sharp. Heavier than 18-70 but quality seems to be alot better. Black coners at 16mm, but not visible at higher F number.

APS-C常用焦段都有齊，
發色濃，
數碼鏡中的立體感較強。

16mm黑角，
要收光圈至f/4才好一點。

好好的旅行鏡，
發色濃。

1.蔡頭一支，拎出去影相個藍標真係幾好J
2.D色同我之支用果支1855 Kit 比真係天地之別，同一個畫影出黎，蔡果支sharp好多，個畫層次感好太多
3.16-80個range 唔洗講，實用，影風景到影遠少少既野咩都得，再遠少少你咪自己後期係80 mm再Crop ，反正而家相機起跳2000萬，大把空間
4.夠輕，以前我唔覺，而家上左FF ，好少少既鏡都要500-600 g起跳，呢支400 真係輕
5. 成支3.5 -4.5 ，去到80都係4.5 ，虛化能力唔錯，拎黎拍花都唔錯架
7. 蔡色，蔡頭真係有蔡色，呢個1650 2.8比唔到你

1. 成也3.5 敗也3.5 ，16-50 支2.8 前段虛化比佢好

好多人拎1650同呢支比，我會買呢支，如果真係7990，無人會買呢支鏡，太貴，搵水魚買，都幾近買到2支canon紅圈了，不過而家呢個價，仲要有16-80，拎黎做相機標頭真係幾抵幾萬用，除左影wide 野，你幾乎唔會換鏡頭，16-50就係輸係呢點，如果影有日光既野，大家都會收到F8 光圈，兩者真係無咩分別

實用range
色彩豐富
Sharp, 夠唔夠16-50 2.8 sharp? 睇落去
輕便易攜

造工一般
我支二手舊版貨, 有蔡花, 但係唔算好嚴重, 應該無影響成像
入塵, 不過可能我唔太錫鏡, 就算70200G我都入到塵, 所以無視了

好耐之前已經想入, 不過因為蔡花DUP頭入塵勁之類問題, 覺得唔值呢個價所以入手左支1650 2.8先; 最近2字頭入左支2手, 雖有蔡花但實用上無咩問題, 個人覺得可用.

好多人話1650 2.8利過細蔡多多, 又有人話係前者攝影技巧唔夠唔熟支鏡先唔知1680幾利, 邊個啱? 其實兩個都有道理, 不過兩者著眼點唔同
1650全開光圈至4.5中心部同1680比都要利, 但係5.6打後已經無咩分別, 到F8直頭完全一樣; 但係如果講邊緣四角, 1650只係贏到小小頭段光圈, 但係一路收光圈細蔡就好快追上黎, 同時1650就無咩改善, 甚至出現中間焦段光圈F8時細蔡反勝1650既情況.

簡單講句, 呢支係一支好好既日光鏡, 用佢做旅行鏡日光下影景物輕便易用, 收細d光圈會有好好效果, 除非你日光下影景有1/3000秒曝光需要; 50-80呢段亦可提供唔錯既特寫; 前提係你要接受到一系列細蔡面對既造工設計問題, 自問如果唔係實用派對鏡面有冇霉有冇塵之類有要求就唔好入了, 特別係舊版二手
如果係覺得自己有需要室內或低光手持影相/有速度需求, 就入1650喇, SONY大部分A機既ISO表現都一般般, 1680低光影會令你覺得失望

有zeiss logo
Range 好用，16-80
夠sharp
二手入夠便
輕

Dup 頭問題
光圈太細

其實一直好想入手，貪佢有zeiss logo, 而且由廣角到遠端都影到，又夠輕，終於2 手買入
可能因為薄filter ,16mm 吾覺黑角問題