[ivanclw]

大家同意嗎?

[mr.unknown]

Personal Skill > A1 / 8080 / Pro1 / 828 / 8700

[chrissing]

not
8080>A2>Pro1>828>8700

[gaiuswong]

Function & operation compare, I don't know, but on their len's center resolution : Pro1-- 18LW/PH > F828--18LW/PH > CP8700--15LW/PH > A2--13LW/PH. C8080--no test file. (information found on www.dpreview.com)

[benjaminlnm]

A2>Pro1>8080>828>8700

[vaworld]

又黎?! 人地講緊A2 ...
邊個放A1 3千7? 我好有興趣!

[bb86]

Fuction:
8080>A2>Pro1>828>8700

Photo quality:
8080>Pro1>8700>A2>828

Outlook:
Pro1>8700>A2>828>8080

只係個人意見. :)

[oldbig76]

煩吾煩o的呀...
成日出埋哂o的咁o既post...
比比比...
都吾知有乜好比,自己鐘意用乜咪買乜law
比完最好洗吾洗頒個獎比佢呀!
比完之後,最好果間賣機多左,會吾會分番o的錢比你地呀!
成日係度比..不如影多o的相,交流下啦.
總之自己鐘邊部咪買邊部law,洗乜理其他人癈UP!
記住機係自己用o既!

[vaworld]

Mr fat, 老實講句, sorry, 我真係冇睇呢本雜誌 ...
我冇真係仔細用過, 所以亦不會比較.
但你一開聲用價錢來衡量好壞 ... 我對呢個態度就有所保留 ...

另外好多產品都係 oem, 但係唔代表佢地係一樣質素
亦不一定係原來生產商會比較好...
大陸有好多生產商係出 oem, 你會唔會認為用佢地自己嘅 brand name 嘅產品一定比外面 brand 好?

[Elliott]

>>自已買本 e-zone 睇下喇.唔好下下問人借或者得個問字先得架
果部 係A1 喎... 唔係A2 喎...

如果而家A2真係 三千幾 我都想入返部....

[gaiuswong]

"a2既 ccd 都係sony出既,sony無咁白痴丫??? " Sony F828 used CCD, other four brand also oem Sony this CCD, you hear have other brand product 2/3" 8mp CCD? all five DC used same CCD, another image quality just depend on their own lens & image capture convert software.

[vaworld]

其實二手價高低有好多原因 ...

1. 產品性能及質素
2. 有冇內在問題
3. 牌子
4. 用家接受情度
5. 更新產品

1. & 2. 相信不須解釋

3. 牌子佔了其中一個不小因素, 有好多機根本唔係太好但二手價卻不低.
好似5700同G5 對焦慢卻二手價不低 (我個人認為對焦準確同速度先係呢類相機中最重嘅優點而並不是影像質素, 因為佢决定你能不能捕捉到最重要時刻, 手動對焦對呢ｄ機只算係裝飾)

4. 亦睇市場中嘅用家係咩人居多, 一ｄ只係放在電腦中看一比一成像而不是看整張相構圖, 意境和能不能捕捉到重要時刻, A1 呢ｄ性能不差而noise 較多就會被人認為不夠好. 香港用家相信多數係前者.

5. 同時A1 二手價低係之前多人買, 但係A2 出現令多了人放 ...

只係單從數字去睇佢地好壞實在太表面.

而且評一隻药可能對你係仙丹, 別人卻有可能係毒药!

[iamawh]

Really all SONY CCD??
Seem Canon has its own CCD~~

[gaiuswong]

F828 many user said have noise & image not very smooth, Pro1 have best L len good image quality, but also very hard to control this CCD's noise, compare with noise more than G3, cp8700 compare with CP5700 also have a little more than noise,so if the CCD have noise can't full cover & hide it,
" 好似5700同G5 對焦慢卻二手價不低" because they also have good image quality,"認為對焦準確同速度先係呢類相機中最重嘅優點而並不是影像質素,因為佢决定你能不能捕捉到最重要時刻," why not use D-SLR?if you need fast focus & response sure DC can't compare with D-SLR, so my first will take image quality,so I not 接受最重嘅優點並不是影像質素, I buy & very enjoy Pro1 on it image quality, not too mind on it not so fast focus & response,
Last my opinion, A1 二手價低reason on it a newly DC come out only few month, but very fast replaced by A2,& 之前於撰擇月刊,馬德忠序拿住部E1果期)影像清淅度一項五粒星為滿分,但Minolta A1只有三粒星, image quality have problem?

[Elliott]

>>"認為對焦準確同速度先係呢類相機中最重嘅優點而並不是影像質素,因為佢决定你能不能捕捉到最重要時刻," why not use D-SLR?if you need fast focus & response sure DC can't compare with D-SLR, so my first will take image quality, so I not 接受最重嘅優點並不是影像質素

如果 放"對焦準確同速度"為重點既 應該揀DSLR 既話... 放"影像質素"為重點既 同樣(甚至更加)應該揀DSLR啦... ProsumerDC外於輕便關係 個感光片比DSLR細咁多 相信都好難做到同DSLR相同既Quality啦... 反而Speed已經開始做得比較接近啦....

而我既想法同vaworld相約... 最重要係影到/做到 其次先係影得/做得好唔好...