近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
FF_Dom
註冊: 2002-05-09
上載我的肖像
|
CMOS on Digital SLR Post time: 8 月 22 日 |
|
|
Sorry if some people did ask and answer before..
But I want to know why D-SLR usually use CMOS, not CCD,
and why Prosumer/lower grade DC use CCD, not CMOS?
Is it the cost problem??
|
|
|
|
 |
HWC
註冊: 2003-01-30
上載我的肖像
|
Re: CMOS on Digital SLR Post time: 8 月 22 日 |
|
|
CMOS 成本較平, 所以 DSLR 可以賣平D, 但 CMOS 發展空間仍很大, 而 CCD 已差不多到頂了.
|
|
|
|
 |
FF_Dom
註冊: 2002-05-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: CMOS on Digital SLR Post time: 8 月 22 日 |
|
|
It seems CMOS is better than CCD (lower power consumption and less thermol noise).. So what is the reason why low end CCD are not using CMOS, but keep using CCD?
|
|
|
|
 |
kennethdouglas
註冊: 2003-03-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: CMOS on Digital SLR Post time: 8 月 22 日 |
|
|
But Compare to CCD , the CMOS image still not sharp enough.
|
|
|
|
 |
hkhei
註冊: 2002-06-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: CMOS on Digital SLR Post time: 8 月 22 日 |
|
|
sharpness 好多視都係視乎部相機落左幾多sharp
|
|
|
|
 |
aig
註冊: 2003-03-20
上載我的肖像
|
Re: CMOS on Digital SLR Post time: 8 月 22 日 |
|
|
"sharpness 好多視都係視乎部相機落左幾多sharp "
what's meaning??
|
|
|
|
 |
hkhei
註冊: 2002-06-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: CMOS on Digital SLR Post time: 8 月 22 日 |
|
|
o的相機internal 會加sharp 張相..所以o的sample sharp唔sharp...
就視乎佢落左幾多sharp(當然..都同鏡頭有關)
要sharp o既話,自己開ps用usm都可以加sharp...
|
|
|
|
 |
tam_dominic
註冊: 2002-10-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: CMOS on Digital SLR Post time: 8 月 22 日 |
|
|
Both DSLR and Con/Pro-sumer use 3 sensor elements to represent one dot of image. This is the reason why their image is not sharp.
Only Foveon technology using by Sigma SD9 (but also CMOS) use 1 element to represent one dot of image. This is why image from Sigma SD9 is so clear and sharp.
Sharpening in Software is another story.
Happy shooting !
|
|
|
|
 |
hkhei
註冊: 2002-06-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: CMOS on Digital SLR Post time: 8 月 22 日 |
|
|
so what's your point on cmos VS ccd?
|
|
|
|
 |
FF_Dom
註冊: 2002-05-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: CMOS on Digital SLR Post time: 8 月 22 日 |
|
|
Don't know if I am right.
Base on the structure problem
*D-SLR need larger sensor, where other DC can use smaller sensor
*CCD is better than CMOS, can provide a better image, but has larger power consumption, produce more heat caused thermal noise.
*for the same size, CCD is expensive than CMOS, to make a large CCD for D-SLR, very expensive (or have technical problem), so they use CMOS instead.
|
|
|
|
 |
hkhei
註冊: 2002-06-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: CMOS on Digital SLR Post time: 8 月 22 日 |
|
|
其實都唔係
以而家o既dslr 用o既cmos,
o係質素上已經比得上,甚至已經超越左ccd
|
|
|
|
 |
twbchang
註冊: 2002-12-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: CMOS on Digital SLR Post time: 8 月 22 日 |
|
|
請分清楚 sharp and clear 的問題。
sharp / soft 是鏡片質素或 software 做成,如 soft lens 或多層鍍鏌。
clear / blur 是鏡片組的成焦問題,如 out focus 或色散(顏色的波長不同) 問題。
CMOS - 平、慳電、感光較差、不生熱小 noise。
CCD - 貴、食電、感光較好、易熱後生 noise。
|
|
|
|
 |
terencefcp
註冊: 2003-08-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: CMOS on Digital SLR Post time: 8 月 23 日 |
|
|
D-SLR usually use CMOS ,Dc usually use CCD...?我想大家是Canon迷了,其實剛好相反,一般低Grade的DC如台湾或韓國不出名的出品多用CMOS,又或電腦常用的Webcam也多用CMOS,因價錢較便宜,而Nikon,Fujifilm,Olympus甚至最專業1600萬像的Kodak Pro Back都是用CCD作感光元件!其實在各大網站及雜誌常看到"CMOS質素已直迫CCD"又或"CMOS已可與CCD較量"等用詞已知CCD質素一向領先,不過近年Canon開發的CMOS迹步迹趨,質素已相當好!但論超越則未敢茍同,當然商人出商品Cost是一大考慮,用低一點價錢用到差不多的產品當然更好!
|
|
|
|
 |
|