近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
drunkard
註冊: 2003-07-30
上載我的肖像
|
新機測試的為什麼不測時滯?? Post time: 10 月 10 日 |
|
|
DC的時滯問題其實對攝影者影響很大,但現在的那些DC測試報告,一味測影相,不理會時滯,真不明白這是為什麼,影相多漂亮,但拍不到想拍的東西又有什麼用呢???
|
|
|
|
 |
ninekit
註冊: 2002-10-08
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 新機測試的為什麼不測時滯?? Post time: 10 月 10 日 |
|
|
Very good point, absolutely agree shutter lag is a big thing for a decent camera.
i think the reason they don't test this is because that may involve sophisticated and expensive equipment for the test.
And maybe depends on the purpose of the test/review, the author/tester may not want to disclose those scary number to potential buyers.
so far the best DC review site i have found which include shutter lag measurement is www.image-resouce.com. i hope it helps.
|
|
|
|
 |
vkwtsui
註冊: 2003-01-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 新機測試的為什麼不測時滯?? Post time: 10 月 10 日 |
|
|
www.dpreview.com has also reported the figures on autofocus/shutter lag ...
|
|
|
|
 |
drunkard
註冊: 2003-07-30
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 新機測試的為什麼不測時滯?? Post time: 10 月 10 日 |
|
|
謝謝上面兩位,不過www.image-resouce.com上不到,,不過仍然很感謝.
|
|
|
|
 |
ninekit
註冊: 2002-10-08
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 新機測試的為什麼不測時滯?? Post time: 10 月 10 日 |
|
|
ng ho yee si, should be
http://www.imaging-resource.com
|
|
|
|
 |
|