[marino]

Also.....7Hi ,Fuji s7000 or Panasonic DMC-FZ10 which one u will choose...?

[winson531]

FZ-10 is not of the same grade.
In turns of functions, both S7000 and 7Hi wins
in turns of zoom , of cuz Fz10 wins
Functions, 7Hi and S7000 have their own pros
but 7Hi often hand gay and with a lower battery life,好多用家都知

[benson_wmt]

如果 Fz 10 係用 大d 既 ccd (e.g. 1/1.8)
再用埋 5.0 mp ...
i think 可能 勝過 s7000... 不竟 s7000z 沒有漂亮 的 ISO 100

[winson531]

12X tele,
wide 時無眼看了......
leica lens只有一兩塊.........

[wing2010]

winson531:

有無咁嚴重呀? 係咪真係tele與wide不能共存呀? 就算以而家既科技都唔得? 而且佢有恆定光圈, 會唔會有少少幫助?

[ae111]

支持FZ10

[ninekit]

dear winson531 hing,

what make you think FZ10 at 35mm is that bad ?

i think a lot of other friends here will be v. keen to know.

[wingmak]

其待Panasonic DMC-FZ10有好表現

[wing2010]

我岩岩偶然在發表品睇左tam_dominic兄用fz-1影既相, 出黎既quality真係幾好! 所以我相信fz-10應該都唔會太差! (當然純粹係主觀感覺)

[griffon]

係lor, 個ZOOM 係大, 不過個ccd 咁Q 細, 好擔心.......唔通要帶冰袋"Full full" 佢先再影?

[Elliott]

>>係咪真係tele與wide不能共存
的確高倍數鏡相對地 質素與價錢比(p/c) 比較低... 而要係高倍數鏡維持高品質 難度非常高...
但然而隨著感光元件大細縮小(又或者 解像度降低)... 相對地 對鏡頭既要求亦都大大降低... 要係高質相機上做出高質高倍數鏡頭難 但要fulfil一些質素較低或像數較低既相機 高倍數鏡頭係可以較容易實踐到 而價格亦唔會太高既...

然而 你都可以係高質相機上 用上較低質既高倍數鏡頭... 只不過係會有人覺得委屈左部機咁解ja...

[wing2010]

Elliott:

咁係咪即係話, 假設ccd同鏡片條件一樣, 如果我用部fz-10影完相再resize做三百萬像, 咁相quality應該好過用z-1影出黎, 係咪咁呀?

[tam_dominic]

I highly recommend FZ10 basing on the spec.

But .....

My FZ1 fail to focus after 10 months of use on every Sunday

Apart from spec. durability is now one of my concern.

I took my FZ1 to repair twice in afternoon but the shop still close.
I'll try again tomorrow afternoon.

Most likely I'll have no photo to post in a month or two :-(

[Elliott]

>>如果我用部fz-10影完相再resize做三百萬像, 咁相quality應該好過用z-1影出黎

我唔係咁既意思... 我只係想指出係DC上由於 CCD細而且質素較低一點... 所以對鏡頭要求較低 所以係DC上用上質素較低一點既高倍數鏡頭 亦不會太影響DC本身既質素...