近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
John Lok
註冊: 2002-06-09
上載我的肖像
|
Hair in Canon EF 85 f/1.8 USM lens??? Post time: 10 月 20 日 |
|
|
Hi everybody,
Well, I have just purchased a Canon EF 85 f/1.8 USM in Man Shing on 18/10. The first one is seriously scratched on the lens cap. The second one is very dirty. Finally, the third one seems to be OK. When I take a closer look at home, I just find that there is a "BIG" hair within the lens elements. What the hell is going with Canon's quality check? Is it normal or paranormal with Canon lens?
Do I need to get it back for replacement? Please give me your opinion.
|
|
|
|
 |
Aliu
註冊: 2002-12-04
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Hair in Canon EF 85 f/1.8 USM lens??? Post time: 10 月 20 日 |
|
|
For sure you should get a replacement. I also have my EF85 bought in Man Shing and luckily it is fine. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
 |
thomas87
註冊: 2003-07-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Hair in Canon EF 85 f/1.8 USM lens??? Post time: 10 月 20 日 |
|
|
Of course, it is abnormal. A prompt replacement is a must.
|
|
|
|
 |
軍佬
註冊: 2002-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Hair in Canon EF 85 f/1.8 USM lens??? Post time: 10 月 20 日 |
|
|
你指既 "hair" 係毛定頭髮?!
Anyway, ?去問問有無得換先啦。
|
|
|
|
 |
John Lok
註冊: 2002-06-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Hair in Canon EF 85 f/1.8 USM lens??? Post time: 10 月 20 日 |
|
|
Hi Alui, thomas87 & 軍佬,
Thanks for your replies.
Well, I mean "毛", not "頭髮". It's a most visible "毛". Because I have already opened 3 Canon EF 85 f/1.8 USM lenses over there in Man Shing, so I just wonder whether Man Shing is willing to exchange me another "brand-new" one or not.
Is there something wrong the quality of Canon lenses???
|
|
|
|
 |
vaworld
註冊: 2003-09-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Hair in Canon EF 85 f/1.8 USM lens??? Post time: 10 月 20 日 |
|
|
>>Well, I mean "毛", not "頭髮". It's a most visible "毛".<<
u mean "霉"?
|
|
|
|
 |
John Lok
註冊: 2002-06-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Hair in Canon EF 85 f/1.8 USM lens??? Post time: 10 月 20 日 |
|
|
Sorry for my incorrect expression. It seems to be a thin line or "毛線".
|
|
|
|
 |
|