9 月 21 日 (星期日) | 會員登記|會員中心
吹水閒聊
近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 
頁數: 1共 0 回應
上個主題 :: 下個主題  
作者 訊息

@香港熊@




註冊: 2003-05-06

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 21 日

哇哈哈,你好風趣 wor
Back to top

Hercules




註冊: 2002-06-22

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 21 日

I want Sinar 4x5 + Digital Back!!! 22MP!!
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

逍遙




註冊: 2003-10-19

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 21 日

花了3500萬美元?????給我百份之一我可以永遠不玩相機^Q^
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

水貨佬




註冊: 2002-10-20

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 21 日

富士製造CCD有多年的經驗, 和柯達的年期差唔多
而Canon就好遲先加入.
因為Canon要搶回一定的市場, 所以改用生產成本平的CMOS.
由於CMOS的感光度低和製作時間年資短, 所以影像質數是較差.
幾年之後就好難講, 但是現在質數一般.
而富士的數碼背(digi back)就達到22M, 44M影像Size.
質數之高達4x5.
而來年的Fuji S3 pro在日本有消息話可以和"正片"比美.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Briancat




註冊: 2003-01-06

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 21 日

可能是 Fuji 價錢及合約條件較好吧, 應不是 super CCD 吸引力, 還有, Hasselblad 未必和 Canon 及 Kodak 談得來, 話晒Canon 是日本第一大光學儀器廠, 而 Kodak 又是 colour 標準, 還有, 班日本人話 Fuji 才是二流, 不是一流, 二流不是不好, 只是唔係最好的相機廠.

我都用過 602, 好多功能, 但個人認為它絕不能當機王, 最多只是好機一部.

還有, 日本咁鍾意收購歐州大廠, 你估Hasselblad 唔驚給 Canon 食咩..(講笑吧)
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Hercules




註冊: 2002-06-22

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 21 日

The main shareholder of Hasselblad is Shriro Group, that's Hong Kong based Company.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

vaworld




註冊: 2003-09-12

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 21 日

H1 is not a very new camera. It was launched at the last year's Photokina. I don't think it was a very special camera, its just like Contax's 645. Both of them are designed to use either film or digital back.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Hercules




註冊: 2002-06-22

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 21 日

The Hasselblad 200 and 500 series can use Kodak, PhaseOne digital back using Kodak CCD, as that time only Kodak able to manufacturer such a large size CCD.

The story begin in X-pan, hassy first 35mm camera, it's join project of hassy/fuji, as fuji have manufacturing of 35mm camera, medium format camera with AF and rangefinder operation and wide panomona view camera, so it's 70% fuji, with the name of hassy on it.

Later Fuji and Hassy join invent of H1, first AF medium format of Hassy(hasselblad lack of experience in electronic and AF system, as Fuji can help this time again, as hassy must keep up with Mamiya, Contax and Rollie, that they're already have own AF Medium format machine!!), so H1 again is hybrid product of Fuji and Hasselblad, the optical surely using fujinon lens, no more Carl Zeiss. H1 electronic mainly made by Fuji, so Fuji to be first maybe only provider of digital back, that's one of the H1 project scope, i have no surprise hassy MUST use Fuji SuperCCD digital back, and it's still a big question mark for Fuji first time large size CCD, compare with industry standard of Kodak CCD.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

6x4.5




註冊: 2003-03-21

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 21 日

不知所謂
你知唔知哈蘇何解同Fuji合作?
因為做Xpan時就己經合作過, H1合作係因為哈蘇唔識做AF鏡同AFbody, 又睇中Super EBC, 己唔係咩 super ccd
怳且H1又唔一定要用fuji digital back, 出面大把選擇, 以我所知有好多人用Kodak, 更多人用film back
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

ninekit




註冊: 2002-10-08

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 21 日

um .... no personal attack here,

H1 isn't anything new, and i think Hasselblad eyeing the venture is not because of Fuji's Super CCD, as its simply not in the same league.

In fact a lot of professionals turn away from H1 because of they can't use Carl Zeiss lenses anymore. So to me, H1 and Fuji's venture is a compromise for Hassy, and the H1 is not as popular as expected.

I have found a review posted in photo.net

http://www.photo.net/equipment/hasselblad/h1/

From the reader's comment, its mentioned the AF module is actually made by Minolta. And a lot of reader comment on the Fuji lens create a lot more worse "bokeh" compared to Carl Zeiss and Leica glasses, which I personally agreed.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

kyohsey




註冊: 2003-07-28

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 21 日

數少左nikon
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

HWC




註冊: 2003-01-30

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 21 日

Brother ninekit always gives us a professional feeling. You are right. That's the reason why many people don't like H1.

Maybe, Mr. Wong doesn't like Zeiss and Leica.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

ninekit




註冊: 2002-10-08

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 21 日

HWC, thanks for your words, I am just a humble camera player, I don't even stamp myself as a photographer, very very far from being one.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Ekamz




註冊: 2003-06-10

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 24 日

To fat_chai_wong:
u are so interesting ar,
我想問問你何以見得
Canon, Fuiji & Kodak 可以三分天下呢?
期待你的高見
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

winson531




註冊: 2003-06-18

上載我的肖像
題目Re: fat_chai_wong 極期望的機種     Post time: 11 月 24 日

how about nikkon and olympus???
fuji olympus and ....together release the four third system wor~
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top
 
頁數: 1共 0 回應
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 



 討論區列表  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password: