[yewaitung]

因為我只看重相的質素，其它不太重要，大家覺得應該那一部會比較好些？Thx

[老叟]

梗係W1喇,個價巳經差好遠!!

[gaiuswong]

But CP5200 have 6 組包含 7 元素 (1 個 ED 鏡
頭及 2 個非球狀鏡頭)woo......on image quality, I believe compare to W1 not worse than or 差好遠!! two of them depend on image quality ,I like more beleive CP5200 , on outlook & size ,2.5" LCD sure W1.

[yewaitung]

但SONY的鏡頭都應該唔差喎，但此機是不是用SONY最新的4CCD呢？如果係就"正"囉！

[yewaitung]

請問如果影Marco的話，兩者誰如好些呢？

[gapman]

For Macro, of course Nikon is the best !

[晉華帝]

4CCD?????唔好發夢喇, 得F828有咋

[crazybean]

有無人知邊度有 photo samples 睇呀? W1有好多地方有, 但 CP5200 就連日本官網都未有

我覺得兩部機各有優點, 睇你點比:

W1: 2.5" LCD, M-mode (不過得兩個光圈)

CP5200: 99 selectable focus points, center-weighted metering, WB bracketing, 5-shot buffer, stitch assistance

[yewaitung]

咁請問w1的MARCO最多可以影到幾近呢？

[jhz]

The sample for 5200:
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/nikon/coolpix5200-review/gallery.shtml

[itzyee]

http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/sony/dsc_w1-review/gallery.shtml
如果睇埋 sony W1 既 sample,
你地覺得邊部d 相靚d 呀??

[judi922]

好似 sony w! 好d ~

[yewaitung]

Marco:
W1 =6cm
5200=4cm
這回合5200勝出