近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
fusion
註冊: 2004-06-21
上載我的肖像
|
Leica Digilux 2 同 Panasonic LC1 有咩唔同? Post time: 6 月 21 日 |
|
|
本人覺得這兩部數碼相機很相似,請問除了品牌及售價之外,其他如機件結構、部件、手感、影相質素等有何不同?
兩部相比邊部值得買?
請告知大約幾銀?邊度有得賣?
|
|
|
|
 |
晉華帝
註冊: 2004-02-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Leica Digilux 2 同 Panasonic LC1 有咩唔同? Post time: 6 月 21 日 |
|
|
LC1 => $9000
Leica => $13000
|
|
|
|
 |
zeusho
註冊: 2003-09-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Leica Digilux 2 同 Panasonic LC1 有咩唔同? Post time: 6 月 21 日 |
|
|
當然不是咁簡單啦…
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/DXO-Tests/DxO-LC1-Digilux2.shtml
|
|
|
|
 |
fusion
註冊: 2004-06-21
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Leica Digilux 2 同 Panasonic LC1 有咩唔同? Post time: 6 月 21 日 |
|
|
zeusho兄:
非常多謝 閣下提供有關網址,但很遺憾小弟啲英文真係有限公司,睇極都係睇唔明嗰啲咁專業嘅報告,可否勞煩zeusho兄喺度作簡單轉述,等小弟得以識多少少。
不情之請,感謝感謝﹗
|
|
|
|
 |
zeusho
註冊: 2003-09-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Leica Digilux 2 同 Panasonic LC1 有咩唔同? Post time: 6 月 21 日 |
|
|
Please note that I am making the assumption that the Panasonic LC1, which I tested, and the Leica Digilux 2, which I didn't, are essentially the same camera. This assumption is based on public remarks by representatives from both companies and also anecdotal evidence. While the cameras differ in some minor cosmetic ways, and appear to have slightly different in-camera JPG processing settings, I am comfortable in assuming that they are otherwise identical.
根據作者測試,兩部相機的機內JPG處理是有點不同的…
等我睇完再同你交流一下!因為我之前都想買部LC1玩?…
|
|
|
|
 |
zeusho
註冊: 2003-09-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Leica Digilux 2 同 Panasonic LC1 有咩唔同? Post time: 6 月 21 日 |
|
|
A Hands-On Evaluation of the LC1
With three separate reviews so far on this site prior to this one I won't bother with anything more than some general observations and a few personal comments. Firstly, it seems to me that there is no reason to buy the Leica version of this camera when the Panasonic is essentially the same camera with the same lens, but for hundreds of dollars less. Of course if having the Leica logo is more important to you than saving money, who am I to say otherwise?
But the LC1 seems to me a better choice not only because of its lower price, but also for what you get and a few functional differences. I much prefer the black finish of the LC1. The chrome Leica is pretty, but the black finish of the LC1 is much more practical when it comes to doing unobtrusive street shooting, and to ward off thieves. (No one would steal a lowly Panasonic camera, now would they?) Also the LC1 has a molded hand grip, which makes the camera significantly more comfortable to hold with one hand for long periods of time. The LC1 also ships with a hard-to-find 69mm UV filter and an electronic cable release. The Leica does have a longer warranty though in most markets and also some proprietary remote control software.
兩都外觀不同,作者認為LC1個機身做得好一些,不過作者說笑認為小偷只會偷Leica Digilux 2,不會偷LC1 (可能是價值問題乎?) LC1有個好一些(硬膠突出的手把),手拿會比較舒適,而且跟機送原廠69mm UV filte及其他連機電線。而LD2則有長一點的保用期,在香港我沒有記錯是話是3年保用。
|
|
|
|
 |
fusion
註冊: 2004-06-21
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Leica Digilux 2 同 Panasonic LC1 有咩唔同? Post time: 6 月 24 日 |
|
|
zeusho兄,多謝哂﹗
仲有邊位專家可以提供意見?小弟好需要你哋嘅幫忙。
|
|
|
|
 |
|