[lee_yat_ming]

相對於85/1.8, 你認為是否值得以近四倍的價錢買一支85/1.2L?
資料提供:
EF 85/1.8 行貨, 價錢: 約$2500
EF 85/1.2 L 只有水, 價錢: 約$11,000

[fdman]

for影相一般而言，唔值

[dnamc2]

F1.2 聽說外拍會 over 的

除非收返細個光圈

[老叟]

梗係1.8啦!!

[terrylamnet]

1.8都得啦，加成八九千蚊先有支1.2，唔直!!
買1.8啦!!

[yesleung]

如果 EF 85/1.2 能令你拍出沙龍相兼攞埋奬
咁就值晒

[kunyu]

相差幾倍價錢值唔值好難講,兩支鏡頭用料構造都唔同,都係睇你須唔須要啦,在現場光下f1.2的確有其優勢,重有f1.2在觀景器內睇會比現場光更光,對焦會好容易( ^_^ )

[alf_wong]

Not recommended unless 1.2 is a must to complete your task.

1.2 sounds so impress but it is just too big! The depth of field is much too strong on big apeture setting. Therefore I believe 1.8 is more realistic and useful.

Also, the price gap is too big. Why not save the money for other lens while having a few step less with 85/1.8? Look up some review on 85/1.2, there are some negative comments.

Think twice before you buy the 1.2.

[gaiuswong]

我早年買支85~f1.2L時末出支f1.8,因用Nikon時用MF85~f1.4,覺得85mm影人像真係好正,所以轉Canon之後支85~f1.2L我係必買,但係而家更係覺得虛榮心多過實用啦,價錢差唔多買到四支F1.8,重1025g喳住佢真係好似喳住個鉛球咁架,而質素同支F1.8好接近,只係響中心部份好過支F1.8些小,值唔值?虛榮心囉,等於有D人明知支50~F1.4甚至支F1.8質素都好過支50~F1.0L,但係都話要買支50~F1.0L一樣咁心態.

[pl1]

17-40/4 L + 50 /1.4 + 85/1.8 = 85/1.2 L