[HappyLai]

I will buy a DC for travel Europe.

I love Canon that have following point.
1. Boby smaller than A2
2. Noice control is good. I see photos on PDase.com
3. Photo is sharp
4. good white body.
Some is poor on Pro 1
1. zoom is not continously

[wkcjacky]

Actually A2 is better than pro1.
As A2's focus timing is much shorter.
And the AS is very useful in indoor...
altought A2 is much more noise than pro1..
the function of A2 can play much more time.
And the Config is very gd,
The size of A2 similar to pro1.
Moreover A2 is much more cheaper than Pro1.
Pro1 is expensive.

If i choose Pro1, The only one reason is that the colour of pro1 is much more warm.

[gaiuswong]

A2支鏡解像度係五部八百萬像機中最低,而Pro1係最高,中心解像度係13 LPH vs 18LPH之比,睇番佢地image output分別都幾顯注,就算同其他三部比佢都有距離,唔係爭小小果隻,影像質素唔及就算比個防震你都冇用啦,無疑A2係五部機中操控係最快,所以要快速操控定要好晝質就要你自己決定喇,我一向注重晝質,所以就算我唔揀Pro1我都一定唔會揀A2.

[cervanti]

pro 1 我用左好長時間, 呢部機的確有d瑕疵, 最明顯是 af 不快同埋 drive by wire 的 zoom 環有d "騎呢"。但系成像能力方面就非常之強, 上面果支canon L 鏡系真正世界頂級名鏡, 不是 OEM 或 "特許掛牌生產鏡" 出來D相晶瑩剔透, 是比同級機要好D。

用一部機, 系要發揮它的特長, 其他地方的小瑕疵, 可以通過自己的熟習、適應去改善、減弱。個人認為功能上的東西, 可以通過自己努力去克服, 但是畫質上面, 就是先天問題, 不易解決。

[Enya]

Compared & Conclusion to... five 8mp's http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusc8080wz/page18.asp