近日收到不少網友意見，指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站，此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論，並正密切留意事態的發展。
| 上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
| 作者 |
訊息 |
TLKF
註冊: 2004-11-13
上載我的肖像
|
 Nikon Coolpix 5200-3200, ixus 40 Post time: 11 月 15 日 |
|
|
1.Any photo samples for nikon coolpix 5200 - 3200 and ixus 40?
2.Is nikon or canon better? why?
3. nikon use 2AA batteries.
canon use lithium battery
Any adv. or disadv. for these?
thank you for help
|
|
|
|
 |
gaiuswong
註冊: 2004-03-18
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Nikon Coolpix 5200-3200, ixus 40 Post time: 11 月 15 日 |
|
|
|
nikon use 2AA batteries, coolpix 5200 唔係喎,CP3200就係,cp3200得300萬像1/2.7"細size CCD,係low end 野,IXUS40係400萬像袋裝細size機種,cp5200係500萬像1/1.8"較大size CCD既機種,論晝質更係會好D,三部機都唔同級數,好難比較喎.
|
|
|
|
|
TLKF
註冊: 2004-11-13
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Nikon Coolpix 5200-3200, ixus 40 Post time: 11 月 15 日 |
|
|
Cp3200 - $ 1490 seem good feedback ,light of weight and
Cp5100 - $ 2330 unlimited quantity of movie and cheap.
Cp4100 - $ 2100 More colourful of photo than Canon.
Cp4200 - $ 2450 Is it true?
Cp5200 - $ 2680
Canon A95 - $2650 Seem too large and ugly of appearance
Canon A80 - $2200 3 min. of movie only
Ixus 40 -$2980 seem handsome but poor photo quality
Ixus 500- $2980 ( has a fog in the photo), Is it true?
1.Compare with the $ and photo quality, which one is better? why?
2.Is it large difference of photo quality for 3R and 4R or in computer 's monitor between 300M,400M,500M?
3.How are photo quality when for the indoor or night?
4.how about the quality of the flash?
I am the beginner.
thank you for helps
|
|
|
|
|
gaiuswong
註冊: 2004-03-18
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Nikon Coolpix 5200-3200, ixus 40 Post time: 11 月 15 日 |
|
|
Nikon~CP5200/CP4200
Canon~IXUS500 >IXUS40
Cheap & more function~ A95/A80 but a little heay & large.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
