[Chaser Tourer V]

本人考慮購買 EF28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM 和 EF75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM , 請問有何意見呢 ?

[JT1129]

用咩機？DSLR OR SLR？

[juv]

如果比300D用，要接受支鏡唔夠wide。雖然呢支係一支好鏡。

[JT1129]

Kit lens + EF28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM 一般情形夠用，EF75-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM 呢支除咗IS外一無可取，預多千多元買小小白好過！

[haraylee]

how about EF 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM? Is it much better in terms of picture quality?

[huichook]

i m thinking 100-300 4.5-5.6 USM, any comments?

[tetrapress]

I am thinking to buy that one too....... ^_^

but F4.5 is not big enough , so my 2nd thought is 70-200 F2.8 IS

[huichook]

little white IS is definitely good la
i played with it b4....but kind of heavy.....and it is too expensive for me to afford la~

[BJNKO]

I'M A "NEW HAND".
AGREE WITH "huichook". I ALSO PLAYED WITH "LITTLE WHT", QUITE HEAVY BUT THE "IS" IS AMAZING. I'M CONSIDERING
EF75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM, THE HESITATION IS, f/4-5.6, TOO SMALL.

[darrens]

for 8000 range
EF70-300 f4-5.6 DO IS USM or
二手EF70-200 f2.8L+1.4X extender

[huichook]

if 8000, i would rather get 70-300DO instead of (2nd hand little white + 1.4X extender) lor~

1.4X make the aparture smaller and degrade the image quality

70-300DO is much smaller, and u can get a 1st with the same price, thus it sounds more make sense to me~

anyway....any comments on 100-300mm USM ?????

[Chaser Tourer V]

I used Canon 20D , I'm going to buy lens . Have you give any comment for me ?
And Can u tell me how about the Kit Lens ?

[letni]

how about Sigma 70-300mm F4.0-5.6 APO Macro SUPER II?

[MN56]

如果唔怕重，我建議你考慮Sigma個枝100-300 F4 APO EX HSM！

[walkingfuture]

EF28-135 IS is quite expensive due to it's IS function!! I guess this IS add around $2000 to the lens!. I have one, I can say, it's very good and very convenient because I often take indoor shots. If you are not going to shot indoor photo very often, I don't recommended you to buy this lens.
Instead, Tamron 28-75 is can replace this lens(except the range). This Tamron lens is a vrey sharp and good quality lens, as well as the price also cheaper than 28-135 IS! AND with F2.8.

These two lens are both very good, depends on what kind of photo you often take.

Besides, in my opinion, if you are not often using 300mm range, I suggested you should buy 70-200 /F4 instead of 75-300 IS. The quality is very very different, 70-200/F4 is much sharper than 75-300 IS. And, in my experience, 300mm and 200mm is not quite a bit different in range, so I just brought Sigma 50-500mm APO to cover 200mm~500mm..