[intel875]

鏡頭, 光學是進步還是退步?
大家都話現在的Canon, Nikon..鏡都不及以前的Lecia, Zeiss
有d人仲話Lecia鏡不及Leitz鏡(lecia 的前身),
咁究竟鏡頭, 光學是進步還是退步?

[rickywck]

Definitely 進步 imo.

Canon and Nikon are not as good as Leica or Zesis, not due to the age of the design, but the preference of Japan and Germany designers, manufacturing costs, marketing strategy, etc.

For Leica, most of the lens have several version and in almost all cases, the new version is better than the old version(s). So, we are still improving.

[kunyu]

鏡頭光學就一定係進步,但鏡頭外型就退步,至於影像質感味道就見人見智......
* 以上全屬於個人意見! *

[intel875]

咁都好, 聽到的都係進步

[lmichael]

光學緊係進步,鏡頭質素下降,特別是平價的Canon鏡質素下降,只是因為市場的競爭壓力下降了,Nikon再比唔到太大的壓力Canon,所以入門級的鏡頭都越出越差.

想想佢的DSLR枝Kit 鏡18-55, 因為策略性要爭大Market, 明顯比300枝kit 28-90好一級以上.

[lmichael]

光學緊係進步,鏡頭質素下降,特別是平價的Canon鏡質素下降,只是因為市場的競爭壓力下降了,Nikon再比唔到太大的壓力Canon,所以入門級的鏡頭都越出越差.

想想佢的DSLR枝Kit 鏡18-55, 因為策略性要爭大Market, 明顯比300枝kit 28-90好一級以上.

[crazyleaf]

300d支kit lens咪18-55 lor

[camcenter2004]

光學進步,所以可以偷工減料,鏡頭質素下降!