6 月 22 日 (星期日) | 會員登記|會員中心
吹水閒聊
近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 
頁數: 1 2共 27 回應
上個主題 :: 下個主題  
作者 訊息

雞能




註冊: 2004-01-20

上載我的肖像
題目為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

CANON 機 ISO 800, 1600都冇NOISE???
其實係自家CMOS已經有NR FUNCTION,
即係好似已經內置"Neat Image",
相信用過Neat Image會明白,
出黎o既效果的失真度...

CMOS的NOISE 的確比CCD多好多,
CANON 的CMOS也不是甚麼特別設計,
但CANON全力放在on-chip noise reduction
的確係省錢的做法,
但盲目的消費者沒看清楚事實就亂評擊的確無知!!!!!!
評擊E-300高NOISEo既人,
我相信如果你o地想映靚作品都唔會用ISO 400以上...

以下係CANON COMS 技術文章:
Canon engineers developed three new technologies for their CMOS sensor: on-chip noise reduction...

The new sensor has an amplifier in each pixel to convert optical signals to electronic signals. The unevenness of those amplifiers causes noise that has a fixed pattern. To eliminate the noise, Canon engineers developed on-chip noise-reduction circuitry that reads out the mixture of noise and optical signals in 10 milliseconds and then pure noise in another 10 ms. When the pure noise is subtracted from the mixture, a pure optical signal remains.

Random noise is another problem. The noise is due to the unevenness of the initial level of optical signals at each pixel. Canon engineers improved the pixel structure by transferring electronic charges completely to reset the initial levels of optical signals and noise in each pixel.

The programmable gain amplifier is the first block integrated on the sensor chip to take advantage of the CMOS process. The amplifier eliminates noise and reads out signals at a speed of 12 MHz.

Moving forward, Canon engineers have two major goals in mind for the next step in CMOS sensor development. One is to develop a larger sensor with a higher resolution. Another goal is to develop system-on-chip ICs that integrate the sensor with various blocks on a single chip.
Back to top

gaiuswong




註冊: 2004-03-18

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

盲目的消費者沒看清楚事實就亂評擊的確無知!!!!!!
理論上同事實上好多時唔係成正比喎,咁事實上係咪E-300 noise比EOS 多丫?
最終你想說明或證明d乜野?
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

雞能




註冊: 2004-01-20

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

只為說明CANON的CMOS手法,
以最平成本做騙人的戲法
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

dixonkwok




註冊: 2002-11-14

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

If CCD really excels in large size sensor, Sony (see the recent news) and Nikon (LBCAST sensors) will NOT focus their research and engineering efforts in CMOS anyway.

However, Canon engineers proved to the world that large sensors from CMOS have better quality and lower price than CCD.

If KODAK or SONY can produce large size CCD that can match the quality and price of Canon's CMOS sensors, Canon will use them in 350D or 1DS MarkII just like those in G4, G5 and G6.

It is purely an engineering and manufacturing problems. CCD now only has advantage on smaller size sensors while CMOS excels in larger ones.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Sanke Wong




註冊: 2004-11-03

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

你的長篇大論只屬荒謬﹗不知所謂﹗
EOS降完噪失真有幾多呢究竟﹖省略號只代表你白痴地妄顧事實。
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

gaiuswong




註冊: 2004-03-18

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

CANON 機CMOS已經有NR FUNCTION,內置"Neat Image"
20D而家個NR function係要自已開,唔同以前10D係define自動會開,但唔開NR 20D noise都比10D低左,如果內置左仲使乜自己開?
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

dixonkwok




註冊: 2002-11-14

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

88888888 : You cannot say so as there are too many professionals and users like me that like the Canon CMOS especially in ISO800, 1600 and even 3200.

In Internet age with tremendous information being available in near realtime, anyone including you cannot cheat so easily.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

雞能




註冊: 2004-01-20

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

It's money problem, large CCD can develop but price is high! No company can include large-size CCD in D-SLR because high price, company sell COMS because they can earn more money than CCD, not engineering and manufacturing problems.....
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

gaiuswong




註冊: 2004-03-18

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

CANON的CMOS手法係騙人的戲法 ?

咁事實上係咪E-300 noise比EOS 多丫?!!!
EOS降完噪失真有幾多呢究竟﹖
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

雞能




註冊: 2004-01-20

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

gaiuswong:
20D而家個NR function係除Long Exposure "Stuck Pixels" Noise!!!
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

雞能




註冊: 2004-01-20

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

事實就係你唔知講乜!
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

蔡蔡子




註冊: 2005-02-01

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

唔識唔好亂吠啦, 呢段野講既 Noise Reduction 同你用 software 做 Noise Reduction 跟本係兩回事.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

dixonkwok




註冊: 2002-11-14

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

Based on your assumption, CMOS is cheaper but have higher noise and hence Canon is cheating you right?

Why Nikon and Sony do cheat you the same way using their own CMOS then? They can't do it since they cannot solve the noise problem in CMOS. But Canon CAN and PROVED to be correct in eyes of the whole world except you. You must a genius!!!

But why all of us sees E-300 have higher noise than 300D except you? You must be genius again haha!!!!
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Sanke Wong




註冊: 2004-11-03

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

阿8條8﹕
你反正係想玩下搞事﹐繼續兜囉。
映相係講部機影相出來看相片效果的。所以關鍵是CANON的CMOS EOS DSLR映D相出來
是否令全世界的專業與業余影友覺得“哇﹐除NOISE除到好失真呀﹗”

我就從未聽過﹐你0吾係想搞笑話你“覺得”或你聽過很多呀嘛﹖好獻世囉搞事搞得
0甘低。
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

dixonkwok




註冊: 2002-11-14

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 為何E-300比EOS多NOISE???     Post time: 2 月 24 日

I thin anyone see this message thread shall stop responding to the ONLY genius of the world (88888888)!!. ^_^
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top
 
頁數: 1 2共 27 回應
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 



 討論區列表  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password: