[Fukatsu]

I am considering a Tamron 28-70mm F2.8 and expecting a sharp image, as those guys on some sites posted, because I am feeling the image from Canon kit lens 18-55mm is not sharp.

Is that Tamron a good choice ? any sharp competitor in almost the same price range?

I just would like to hear some idea from you guys.

[ken l]

Tamron 28-75mm f2.8一定靚過kit lens 不過唔夠wide,死馬個支18-50 f2.8呢支話好正喎

[Fukatsu]

Bigma 也是好吸引.... ^o)

[rider555]

so, how much about sigma 18-50? ^^

[ken l]

sigma 18-50 $3XXX

[Fukatsu]

How much is Tamron 28-70mm F2.8?

[Rover416]

我上星期問過支 Tamron 28-70 mm為 $2,890

[beancurdbean]

就我而言, 點靚都唔買28-70, 28mm x1.6=45mm我就好唔夠用, kit 都好d, 想靚頂多補支50/1.8
我就買?18-50/2.8, $3100 DCfever

[arry]

Tamron 28-70mm F2.8 同sigma 18-50 F2.8 ？
Tamron 28-70mm F2.8係小弟最喜歡鏡頭之一
Ssigma 18-50 F2.8 個 Range真係幾好，但佢無咩大光圈鏡特性，F4光圈已經好深景深。

[alanwan]

Tarmon 枝 17-35/2.8-4 可以諗下的

[shatin2]

beancurdbean 兄,我都想買支sigma 18-50 f2.8,
唔知影人像好唔好(比起kit lens).
可唔可以post D相比大家睇下呢??
thank you.

[beancurdbean]

Sigma 18-50/2.8 好少用?影人像, 不過都比kit 好好多
有d sample:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2004/11/29/533.html

影人像應該考慮用定焦及小白系列, 平平地50/1.8都ok, 要靚換?鏡影都應該

[arry]

人像鏡
睇睇以下條Link
http://www.mystudio.hk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=203

[Fergus]

I would like to know which one have better quality (Sigma or Tamron)?