近日收到不少網友意見，指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站，此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論，並正密切留意事態的發展。
| 上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
| 作者 |
訊息 |
nokia2110
註冊: 2004-10-26
上載我的肖像
|
 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 9 日 |
|
|
|
那一位哥兒有這支鏡，質素如何。
|
|
|
|
 |
fever20d
註冊: 2004-10-14
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 9 日 |
|
|
not bad..
quality in the middle....
one word to describe "convinient", one fits all
|
|
|
|
|
kanji
註冊: 2002-11-04
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 10 日 |
|
|
呢支唔店, 買左一定後悔, 好多人買左都好快放換17~40F4L.
因兩支鏡個價差唔多.
如果你想買支一鏡走天涯, 亦可考慮SIGMA 17~135 / 之後會出TAMORON 17~200MM好過.又平.
|
|
|
|
|
buddyhk
註冊: 2003-04-16
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 10 日 |
|
|
Hi friend,
"呢支唔店, 買左一定後悔, 好多人買左都好快放換17~40F4L? "
So what are the problems of this lens please ?
|
|
|
|
|
oldcrazy
註冊: 2002-08-24
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 10 日 |
|
|
相片質素的確比唔上L鏡, 但IS值$1500, USM值$500, range值1500
自己諗諗啦...
|
|
|
|
|
Philippe
註冊: 2003-06-01
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 10 日 |
|
|
|
有時方便都好緊要的,起碼入到室內唔駛推高iso質素分分鐘好過L鏡.
|
|
|
|
|
gaiuswong
註冊: 2004-03-18
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 10 日 |
|
|
|
價接近17~40F4L,非L鏡相片質素比唔上L鏡,光圈又較N記同級支kit 鏡細同貴,咁貴只係買佢個IS唔值囉!
|
|
|
|
|
dixonkwok
註冊: 2002-11-14
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 10 日 |
|
|
It is just too expensive for its small aperture and non "L" nature.
HK$4500 can buy many other good lenses ah!!!
"IS" is good but not good enough to justifiy the price tag.
|
|
|
|
|
korea
註冊: 2004-09-21
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 10 日 |
|
|
I post this topic one month ago when I was making a choice between 17-40L and 17-85. A friendly guy post a link showing the comparison between the two. Photos are put side by side for comparison. The result is "the quality of 17-40L is slightly better."
I said the quality difference is just slightly better because if one put photos by 17-40 and 17-85 one by one, you may not tell the difference.
I remember a guy who said 17-40L may win at this range. But in 40-85 冇就係冇. Simply speaking if you just want one to fit all, you have no choice.
I bought 17-85mm last week. Quite good.
|
|
|
|
|
kanji
註冊: 2002-11-04
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 10 日 |
|
|
buddyhk兄
我睇過之前有外國網站比較過支17~85 & 17~40L (個WEB SITE忘記了)
兩支鏡D質素相差什遠.
""唔駛推高iso質素分分鐘好過L鏡.""
如果DC來說 推高iso對質素影響很大, 但DSLR來說就算去到ISO800 D NOISE都極少. 而且仲要係CANON, NOISE更加少上加少.
|
|
|
|
|
ken l
註冊: 2005-01-30
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 10 日 |
|
|
我睇過之前有外國網站比較過支17~85 & 17~40L (個WEB SITE忘記了)
兩支鏡D質素相差什遠.
------------------------------
呢D測試睇吓好喇,唔好咁認真 L鏡係一個美麗的童話故事
我話L鏡比唔上什廠鏡,你信唔信,入去睇吓,又係個句,睇吓好喇
http://www.jasonlivingston.com/sigma-review/
|
|
|
|
|
kanji
註冊: 2002-11-04
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 10 日 |
|
|
http://www.jasonlivingston.com/sigma-review/
此SITE睇我過啦
|
|
|
|
|
Philippe
註冊: 2003-06-01
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 10 日 |
|
|
L鏡係靚不過唔係靚得咁交關,我覺得太多人太執着係唔係L.Canon的iso 800冇錯唔係好多雜訊,不過係睇到.iso 200點都好過iso 800,唔好忘記仲有機會會用iso 1600.
價錢差唔多,一支可以適應好多環境,一支只係質素上好小小,我選前者.
|
|
|
|
|
gaiuswong
註冊: 2004-03-18
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 10 日 |
|
|
http://www.jasonlivingston.com/sigma-review/
此SITE睇我過啦
呢個乜website黎架名都冇......
L鏡係唔係一個美麗的童話故事都好啦,最緊要你覺得佢好唔好嗟,自己滿意咪得囉!
|
|
|
|
|
KENKEN11
註冊: 2004-08-06
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-85 mm Post time: 3 月 10 日 |
|
|
|
其實洗咩爭論L鏡係唔係一個美麗的童話故事吖... 我只係知道L鏡質素差極有限~大把人用..事實勝如爭辯... 買咗之後一定唔會後悔.. 再唔鐘意既放返出去..二手市場大把人要.... 吐現後又可以買另一支鏡玩吓...都不知幾過引..
|
|
|
|
|
| |
