[snowhk]

http://www.dcfever.com/reviews/Casio/p505/
http://www.dcfever.com/gallery/viewphoto.php?galleryID=161
上面review d相大家睇下差唔差...我唔識睇呢d=.=

[snowhk]

因為我好想買....
我只係係Fortress試過部機...
未知晒出黎點..

唔好意思,幅相大過頭

[平凡的地夫]

粒子較粗, 不過都係睇你個人要求o姐,
呢部機強項在於拍片~
你認為呢樣重要的話就買吧~

[yck18]

Casio d 相片質素,我本人一向都唔睇好,不過呢張都比以往好喇

[snowhk]

yck18:
咁係咪即係靚過Z40呀P600果d架？
ThANKS

[Piclike]

這張相片主要sharp位都是在鐵欄的金屬及油潻面,所以較難評定,
在看四角後都算可以接受.

[snowhk]

Piclike:
咁比起P600同Z55好d嗎？
咁呢張呢？我覺得佢
eview入面d試相呢張最...

[yck18]

我好少留意Casio機,不過睇規格,應該P系列質素好好多,我所講O既同以往D相質俾都係咁下,不過像素提升,解像度當然好好多

[mk07]

KODAK d仲粗

[mk07]

Is correct KODAK d仲粗 x
Sorry!
To All
KODAK d相仲粗,粗過 casio幾倍

[cow_size]

Casio, Kodak.................. Just for fun

If take pic......... >_<

[oldcrazy]

知足常樂

[Happyboy1007]

唔計影像計?話,部野都幾吸引
不過如果計成像就..................唉

[shatin2]

D 相唔算差,買機睇須要,
呢部有5 X zoom,有手動 M mode,
有大LCD (有得扭).唔會太差,
KODAK 唔好買喇,
有手動影室內好好多架

[wklouis]

睇細那幅都OK呀!
晒3-4R都無乜問題, 唔放大相應該可以接受.
唔好拿D相來做WALLPAPER都得.
但張相係本身部機差, 定係攝影既人技術差?