7 月 20 日 (星期日) | 會員登記|會員中心
吹水閒聊
近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 
頁數: 1 2共 15 回應
上個主題 :: 下個主題  
作者 訊息

genewch




註冊: 2004-09-19

上載我的肖像
題目24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 15 日

I'm considering to choose between Canon 24-70mm f2.8 L and 50mm f1.4. The 24-70mm is very versatile and good for wedding ceremonies, conferences, seminars, indoor functions. I love the big aperture of the 50mm. It's a lot cheaper than the 24-70mm. I mainly use these lenses for taking pics of people. Can you help me analyse their strengths and weaknesses and help me choose?

Also, is it true that Canon will raise the prices of all camera products by 6% on Apr 1?
Back to top

阿▁▂㊣▂▁




註冊: 2003-09-04

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 15 日

50mm F1.4
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

genewch




註冊: 2004-09-19

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 16 日

why you choose 50mm f1.4? I have a 17-40mm. The 50mm is a great lens, great quality and light weight. It saves my money too. But does it have a too close focal length to my wide angle zoom and hence makes the 50mm less useful?

For the tele, is it good to have 135mm f2 or 70-200mm f2.8 to complement the mid-range (50mm or 24-70mm)?
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

embu31




註冊: 2003-05-19

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 16 日

I have a 28-70 and a 50/1.4 and I will tell you - they are good at totally different situation. If you don't have the luxury to move back and forth when taking pictures, zoom is a good choice. But f/1.4 is a killer when shooting indoor without a flash - you are talking about extra two full stops of shutter speed! Also a prime lens can out-perform a zoom in terms of optical performance easily. IMO, if you are serous about taking picture but cannot get both at the same time, get the zoom first. Once you have tasted large apreture, you won't touch your zoom again.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

阿▁▂㊣▂▁




註冊: 2003-09-04

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 16 日

genewch 兄,i just follow your topic,

24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4

so, i choose 50mm F1.4 , 原因係,50mm F1.4 平, only $26xx,c/p 高,而質素亦相當之高,你若拿它影人,必勝! 對於24-70mm F2.8L ,我不建議你買,係因為它太貴, $9xxx,雖然它有zoom 的靈活性及超快的對焦功能,但卻不及定焦50mm , use F2.8 up 正,况且多出來的 $5400 左右剛好可以買支行貨小小白 or 17-40mm F4(but you have) ^-^,而在 70-200mm F4L 之段數中,小小白之利也必然利於 24-70mm F2.8L 之成象,50mm F1.4 之成象又必然利於 24-70mm F2.8L 之成象、左計右計,最佳質素而相若支出可不考慮?

不過話時話,在某些場合中,的而且確時間就是先决、例如婚禮、總不能叫新人、親友等你行前行後換 Lens 掛、heehee.........
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

genewch




註冊: 2004-09-19

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 16 日

Thank you. It's a very very difficult choice. My intended use is mainly for indoor functions, group people pictures, stage performances such as music recitals. If the use is static portrait and objects, I'll surely get the 50mm f1.4. But I appreciate the mobility of the 24-70mm zoom, and it saves me time to change a lens. So, is f2.8 enough for general indoor lighting in lecture halls, auditoriums, ballrooms, marriage registries, etc? Another concern is that I have a 17-40mm f4 and a 100mm f2.8 macro. If I choose the 50mm, does it give a field of view too close to the 40mm side of my zoom? Would it be a waste?
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

darrens




註冊: 2003-09-23

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 17 日

用24-70mm f2.8 L之價錢買
28-70 f2.8L(二手) & 50 f1.4 USM,
都應仲有錢餘下
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

bc_hui




註冊: 2004-07-04

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 17 日

you have better make sure what do you want.
it is meaningless for asking the same question for many times.

when you worry about 50mm F1.4 is too close to you 17-40L at 40mm.

on the otherhands, the 24-70 also overlap with your 17-40 at 24-40mm . what do you think about it?

my comment is that F2.8 is not enough for indoor shooting without using flash.

If you really want to have a good indoor photo, you had better get the 550Ex or 580EX plus 24-70L.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

kaiyin1988




註冊: 2005-03-17

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 17 日

tO genewch :
首先我唔知自己既意見合唔合你用啦
好多時其實都係睇你影咩多
如果你想方便 影人 又唔想成日換鏡既話 我會建議你買24-70 因為如果only for影人既話 24-70基本上都夠用架啦
又夠晒方便 影個陣唔使行黎行去 好多時個環境根本就冇得你行既 . . .

D意見 希望你O岩用啦 ^^
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

digi33




註冊: 2004-08-23

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 17 日

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-24-70mm-f-2.8-L-USM-Lens-Review.aspx

有錢我會揀24-70
然後放左支17-40
去換支100 2.8 Macro 及
補支 kit 鏡來影景
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Kancy




註冊: 2004-03-21

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 17 日

I agree with dcfeverend!

I am also considering 24-70L!
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

kaiyin1988




註冊: 2005-03-17

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 17 日

講真丫 24-70真係好好用 又常用 只係重左DD
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

digi33




註冊: 2004-08-23

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 17 日

yee............睇漏左你已有支100mm 2.8 marco添..................咁就更加firm係24-70 la

17-40 就可以留番影wide(如不用幫保24-70的話)

幾舊水買支50mm 1.8玩下啦,真係要追求高質人像,100mm 2.8 marco已經可以完全滿足到你la
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

gaiuswong




註冊: 2004-03-18

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 17 日

17-40 同24-70呢兩段焦距完全冇乜揰凸,又冇重疊架喎,點解一定要揀24-70然後放左支17-40呢?
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

digi33




註冊: 2004-08-23

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 24-70mm f2.8 L vs 50mm f1.4     Post time: 3 月 17 日

我只考慮錢

如果有的話

話之佢是否重叠

一律買哂回來

咁但係佢問得依個問題

我就估佢都有D肉赤

所以建議可賣出一支值租的

去換支kit回來補回17-23個7個mm

都係個句

唔赤就買哂唔駛煩
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top
 
頁數: 1 2共 15 回應
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 



 討論區列表  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password: