[snoopy史]

常常聽人說canon鏡頭較柔，比較適合影人像，而nikon鏡頭較sharp，較適合影風景。

我是D70用家，發覺支18-70mm影人出來有點"假"，立體感很重，感覺不太自然，這是否就是nikon所謂的"sharp"？

(我已較低了sharpness和saturation)

[sai1234]

好難講,post張相來睇睇

[dchchan]

You have to understand what level of lens you are using. Try some high level lens, such as 28-70 f/2.8 and see the difference! You will get for what you paid. So please don't expect too much for what you don't paid.

[gaiuswong]

立體感很重.....咪好囉,d 雞鏡好多時就係image 較平面冇咁立體感,
Dchchan兄, 叫佢搵支AFS 28-70 f2.8ED....個價夠買多套D70 kit 加外閃...加多支死馬....又唔好咁毒死佢.

[micros]

canon 柔 nikon sharp ...... 一笑置之。 ^.^

[Jacky DC]

Snoopy, pls show your portrait photo and let us see.

[tam_dominic]

" 立體感很重 "

是夢寐以求啊 !

Happy shooting !

[wingcarol2003]

yes.... post張相來睇睇
....thank you

[micromax]

立體感是優點來的, 一張平面的相但能有立體活現化何樂而不為! 更像人眼所看的不好嗎???

[Velsper]

先如果硬說nikon 係sharp d
比個例子:

350d 出之前有朋友想買機(影景多)
佢唔考慮350d(canon機)既原因係
係相同價錢下, nikon 既wide 鏡表現要好過canon
( 佢\"發覺"canon邊緣成像無nikon咁好)

在此不論canon wide 鏡係咪咁差
我覺得"sharp" 係支鏡由中心到邊邊既解像都好好(唔會散)

[hlleung8]

呢個問題都困擾左小弟好耐...
有冇大佬可以 post 一張 sharp 同一張 soft 的相
如果小弟「有幸」睇唔出的話, 那小弟便不用花錢買靚鏡了 =P

[ken l]

睇吓你分唔分到,二張都係8xmm f5.6 影嘅,分唔到!你有福喇

[yzcat]

如果冇眼花，好似第二張"sharp D"噃！

[ousi]

我都分到, 第二張sharp d, 係corner位

[ken l]

咁你二個冇福喇!要用靚鏡至得.哈哈..

平時D人話邊支鏡好邊支SHARP 影一般影物較難分好與否,但冇乜人會影報紙泥比較支鏡好唔好 十唔十

如果我二幅圖係風景或大頭人像,就冇咁易分得出邊支較好

影報紙就可以好易睇到支鏡中心邊緣嘅解像力及有冇變形

想知多D你支鏡有幾高解像力,得閒影吓報紙,了解自己的鏡