[sleepingdogman]

本人是一名新手,三個月前買了canon 300D,有一些鏡頭問題想問問大家,希望大家指教一下 :)

1a)本人想買(canon EF 75-300mm f4 - f5.6 IS USM) 這支鏡頭,我去過好多間舖問過下價,大約$3600 - $3980不等,請問這支鏡頭是否值得買?它的Image staibilzar 系統真的有用嗎?它的強項是影什麼呢?我只知他焦佢較長,可以作遠攝用途.其他太清楚.
鏡頭website: (http://www.canon.com.hk/tc/Product/Product.aspx?product_id=326)

1b)有其他Canon鏡頭與它同一功能嗎?本人只想買Canon鏡,其他牌子不想買,最好within $4000 budget

2)鏡頭是否選光圈值越大越着數?

3)什麼是Canon L鏡呀?它和普通的鏡頭有什麼分別?為何L鏡普遍較貴?!?

4)(者)光罩是否有用?它的作用是什麼呢?(者)光罩應在那時才用呢?

5)(Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 L IS USM)其實是否算得上一支全能鏡呢?它和(Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM)有何分別?它們的強弱項在那裏?

6)如果我買了(canon EF 75-300mm f4 - f5.6 IS USM)作一般用途,往後(一年後)再買多支(Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 L IS USM)或(Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM),那我這決定是否多此一舉呢?

由於本人問題眾多,希望各高手救救小第,感邀殊心

[ronald_86]

我都有諗過加支Tele，你既選擇我都有諗過……
如果平價既，我會揀Sigma 70-300mm APO SuperII Marco，如果你用咁既價錢去加IS既話，我就會再儲多千幾蚊，買小小白啦！

[Jacky DC]

For 75-300mm IS, the image quality is not so good, particularly at 200-300mm. At that range, I can say it is rubbish. Also, the IS is not so good. You need to re-think whether you really need to shoot such long focal length and need IS. Otherwise, at such price, it'd be better to pay a little bit more to buy the "little little white" (70-200mm f4.0) to enjoy a better image quality.

[ousi]

L = Luxury.....你知點解la
其實L鏡多數都有幾片特殊lens element, 所以貴d, 而且environment resistant, 重要恆定光圈

如果我揀, 一定揀小小白, 佢成象好sharp

要平, 我都suggest支sigma 70-300 apo真係底, 而同有lens hood同袋跟, 正.....重有得玩下macro

lens hood係用來遮d側光, 免出flare.....其實你鐘意幾時上都得, 只不過lens hood + lens會大件dd, 多數用tele or 對強點光源影時用(如日落/出, 街燈)