DCFever.com

daken2046 · 註冊: 2004-10-23 上載我的肖像

good match ??

lyc1977 · 註冊: 2003-07-10 上載我的肖像

I do think so...
at least a very good budget match

jimcop · 註冊: 2005-04-30 上載我的肖像

sigma 18-200mm 好用。一般影相無問題。我都有一枝。

hondav · 註冊: 2005-03-19 上載我的肖像

Dear daken2046:

The best matches of Canon EOS 350D is Canon EF 17-40/4L., is very rational and clever choice. No need to hestitate buy it or not.

hyuhin · 註冊: 2003-10-17 上載我的肖像

http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2005/04/25/1432.html
本來呢個日文網相話比我地聽 tamron 差過 Sigma 好多
但第2次試相，結果完全不同！

kingkonghk · 註冊: 2003-01-27 上載我的肖像

2支都係18mm時肉眼可見有色散, 可能要收光圈先得, 晒相可能唔覺

daken2046 · 註冊: 2004-10-23 上載我的肖像

Iyc1197,
yes. around 10k-
jimcop,
any good photo to share-
hondav,
how much for EF 17-40/4L
thanks to all.

tomat · 註冊: 2004-02-22 上載我的肖像

想問問有人在dpreview話：
Sigma 18-200mm 其實只是 18-150mm，同Tamron 18-200mm 一比，就現形。

是否真的？

tam_dominic · 註冊: 2002-10-12 上載我的肖像

tomat

The 200mm is defined at infinity. At infinity both Sigma and Tamron are the same 200mm.
Focusing at short distance different design would give difficult angle thus look like it is not 200mm.

http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2005/04/25/1432.html
The 2 times Sigma vs Tamron comparisons were of opposit result.
That is very confusing !

Happy shooting !