[supernova]

我戈部600像ga ma...
佢部g4 wide.....先300.....
成日都話咩28mm......
1cm micro........
d 相又sharp.........
彈我戈部又唔sharp...
外形又唔靚....
又話ccd 1/1.76 ....唔夠佢個1/2.7好.....佢話精細d...
唉....明知我部好d.....都唔知都解釋......

[ian2001s]

像素高唔代表一定好既
都要睇埋部機支咩鏡
d功能好唔好用
我就覺得CANON G系既機唔錯
唔知你個部係咩機呢?

[小班長ErikoB]

1/1.176 大過 1/2.7 ga owr^^"

[supernova]

係wor....唔記得講我部咩機....
OLYMPUS C-60...雖然唔係好勁戈d機....
但係我諗唔會差過g4 wide 呱....(除左wide and micro...)

[Tsun~~]

sharp--600萬resize到300萬一定sharp過你~
ccd--一向ccd越大越好,dslr都係大ccd,唔通dslr差過你?
macro--1cm,貼住主體影??光一早比支lens遮哂~
外形--部g4都唔好得去邊~
28mm---無得講...

[mk07]

supernova
最緊要自己鐘意自己部機!不要理會他人點講!
一山還有一山高!

[Velsper]

好簡單:
你地扲D相出黎睇, 咪知道邊個勁D囉

[mk07]

Velsper
i' agree!

[supernova]

我戈陣時....簡左好耐先簡到呢部機ga....
梗係中意la~

[supernova]

可能我唔識影....又唔知點先叫sharp....
唔知佢d相好定我d好...

[platz]

supernova,
It's the DC you use which is important, we can not define '勁' easily. As long as you feel happy, do not case what other people says.
I also agree with Velsper, you use the DC, not use to compare the features!

[Velsper]

SUPERNOVA,
如果你鐘意, 何需介意佢UP MUG~
好唔好由自己需求而定.

[supernova]

戈個我好朋友黎ga ma....講d野....我都擺係心度ga///
不過聽你地講完.....算la....唔理佢la~

[mk07]

梗係中意la,咁米得lou! OLYMPUS D 機都有咁上ka!

[kcfong]

C-60 只係比CCD 同相質已經遠遠拋離g4wide
ricoh 既樹除左有28mm
冇咩長處
d 相唔得

而且根本唔sharp
noise 多到死
唔detail

你用你部機同你個friend部一齊影同一d 野
去晒8R
你就知邊個sharp d la :p