[Leica Man]

請恕細佬無知,唔明?解好多用數碼機D人兄都喜用呢隻牌子?
菲林年代Sigma係"雜嘜"?,除?平之外冇乜吸引 (成成索性唔賣). 而家多?人用,重潮過其他"雜嘜"(Tamron, Tokina)好多?!

[tam_dominic]

I use Sigma 100-300 F4 because it is fast focus, sharp and cheaper based on the user comment in some web sites.

Since internet become popular words of mouths plays more important role than brand royality.

Happy shooting !

[kingkonghk]

我覺得任何鏡頭中央位置質數都會幾好, 而數碼機就係咁o岩係aps size, 所以邊緣質數唔係咁好都可以唔理, 除非用返135菲林機, 先會覺有分別

[platz]

In HK, Sigma put a lot of efforts in advertising and channel their products (I suppose some improvement as well) , while Tamron and Tokina is not seems to be rolling at all.
I used Sigma FD mounts some 15 years ago when I was a student(poor...) and found that they were poor quality lens.
Until recently I saw some photos taken from my friends (using Sigma SD-9) and found that they really improved a lot. I was amazed.
So the world is changing, and rolling.

[peter_]

睇下支18-200 就知, Sigma 質數好過Tamron(睇網上d比較), 但價錢又平Tamron 好多, 而呢個Range 又只有Sigma 同 Tamron 出喎, 你話唔買Sigma 買邊支啦?

[t-800]

一個明顯在進步的品牌，尤其DC,DG系列, 價平而實惠，如其平價系列可改善暗角之缺點，其CP值則近乎完美……………….。

[MN56]

都係因為平！

[Fattam]

舊事重提:

以前初初影相,聽D報紙記者講過,買Sigma鏡用一年就掉,原因有三:
1. 好很平,開工用冇得頂.撞碰花都唔肉痛. 新用時正到震.
2. Sigma d QC差, 易出問題,唔夾機,壞摩打,時有發生,入廠一整就個幾月.
3. Sigma 鏡 面coating 壽命得2年, 之後掉coat發毛有齊.

之後唔信,去買?支28-70 EX F2.8, 新用真係靚到暈, 又大支,自信心返哂!!
之後好好保養,二年時間, 摩打壞?,向前唔向後,對焦環溶膠,幸好coating冇咩點變,不過已經放起床底超過5年,又冇發毛,手動又正常,冇藉口掉?佢....

[wingcarol2003]

係真唔係呀???
我BUY左支 SIGMA 50-500..現在真玩得好開心呀.....如果好似你講(之後好好保養,二年時間, 摩打壞?,向前唔向後,對焦環溶膠,))

果時我都唔知點算好....不過我現在玩佢真係好鬼死正呀...重好SHARP...FOCUS FAST.....^__^