[Tommy Tommy]

請問下列那支質素比較好，方便用DSLR去旅行

Nikkor 24-120/3.5-5.6 G VR
Sigma 18-125/3.5-5.6 Marcro
Tamron SP 24-135/3.5-5.6 Macro

聽說Sigma 及Tamron 18-200 質素一般。`

謝!

Tommy.

[neville_sitou]

Nikkor 24-120 / 3.5-5.6 G VR
is better , due to VR lens

[neville_sitou]

Nikkor 24-120 / 3.5-5.6 G VR
is better , due to VR lens

[Philippe]

旅行梗係用有VR的鏡啦,除非你唔拍帶腳架.

[Richard1989]

24 120質素唔差, 好多D70用家用佢黎代賛支KIT鏡
用落D70, 變37~184MM(nikon個焦距係乘1.53, 唔係1.5.....), 個WIDE RANGE仲勉強夠影風景
但講真一句...旅行有幾可用TELE, 十張入面九張都係影WIDE居多
點解唔揀KIT鏡(28MM)
再唔係買12~24啦, 平就sigma(可以用埋係film)或者nikon果支(質素最好)

[Tommy Tommy]

我六月下旬會去西藏旅行，我去旅行時喜歡Zoom 埋去影當地人，所以想要支Zoom得下。

論質素，大家意見好似Nikkor 24-120 比tamron同Sigma好D。

仲有無其他看法?

Thanks,

Tommy.

[friend_dicky]

旅行影景還有很多選擇：Nikon 18-35 f3.5-4.5, Tokina 12-24 f4, Tamron and sigma 17-35 f2.8-4，這機支，影景和風景中的人像都已ok！

[friend_dicky]

旅行影景還有很多選擇：Nikon 18-35 f3.5-4.5, Tokina 12-24 f4, Tamron and sigma 17-35 f2.8-4，這機支，影景和風景中的人像都已ok！(以前影相用35mm冇得zoom要前前後後行來行去都影得好開心)

[arry]

睇你要成像好定要方便，針無兩頭利，唔好以為VR點振都得，
只係差兩三級快門，而且24-120mm菲林機就超正，數碼機有D唔上唔落。
或者講講你手上有咩鏡先？
都俾幾個組合你參考，牌子就睇預算啦。
1. 一鏡，最方便，成像普通 - 18-200mm
2. 兩鏡，成像較佳，亦算方便 18-70mm + 70-300mm
3. 兩鏡，最佳成像，亦算方便 17-55mm + 70-200mm
4. 三鏡，最佳成像，最唔方便 17-35/12-24mm + 28-75mm + 70-200mm

[candidfoto]

Nikkor 24-120/3.5-5.6 G VR
Sigma 18-125/3.5-5.6 Marcro
Tamron SP 24-135/3.5-5.6 Macro

I have owned and used these lens for about a year each. The sharpest is no question the Tamron SP 24-135 (I had the 50th anniversary version), the Nikon 24-120 VR has the best color but not as sharp as the Tamron, the VR gains you about two stops but I can always bump up the ISO for other lens too if I have too, I personally don't find VR critical for this type of zoom lens, it's different story for very long telephoto though. The Sigma 18-125 has the best range for travel, the edges are little soft when you shoot with wide open aperture especially between 18 to 24, but once you crank up the aperture to F5.6, the pictures are very good to me.

I have sold the Nikkor 24-120 VR as I like the Tamron better, I later sold the Tamron as I think the Sigma more versatile for a travel lens. Too bad the latest Tamron 18-200 is not as good as the Sigma 18-125, otherwise I would go for it!

[peter_]

我上次去西藏全程用28-200mm (菲林機), 質素未必很好, 但係好方便容易捕捉影像, 比d相你參考:
http://www.tibet.f4w.net

支鏡夠wide及tele 可以幫你減少錯失拍攝機會, 建議Sigma 18-125/3.5-5.6,
想成像好些, 可以收細光圈(F8, F11)

[Philippe]

VR當然唔係點震都得,不過iso更加唔係點加都得.講繄低償兩至三級快門冇用,不過為咗防震加兩至三級iso肯定令影像質素大打折扣,金圈鏡都變kit鏡.

[enos]

Sigma 18-125 la (Good range)

[arry]

"VR當然唔係點震都得,不過iso更加唔係點加都得"
小弟的意思係可揀光圈較大的鏡頭，例如：
1. Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8
2. Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8
本人常用Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8，這鏡f/4.0已經好Sharp，價錢又合理。

[Philippe]

f2.8大3.5唔夠一級光圈,對防手震幫助好細,起碼要去到f1.8.得翻定焦鏡唔方便,而且光圈太大全部變晒淺景深,影紀念照會冇晒背景.