[kbwong]

小弟新買入 CANON 350D連鏡頭，
以有壹枝 SIGMA 18-125mm f 3.5 / 5.6
及 CANON 50mm f 1.8
現想再買多一枝專影人像，及要有明顯淺景深。
(1) CANON 55-200mm f 4.5 / 5.6
(2) TAMRON 28-75mm f 2.8
以上两枝不知如何選擇，
煩請各師兄、師姊、指点迷津？
k b wong 上
謝謝！

[wingtor]

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM

[kbwong]

wingtor兄
CANON EF 100mm f/2.8 曾考慮過，但定焦會否不夠零活？
及出來的景深效果會否與我手頭上三枝鏡有明顯分別？
謝謝！

[rickywck]

影人的話,一定是大光圈定焦鏡,如85mm F1.8.

[friend_dicky]

用sigma 70-300 apo macro super II，影人像要淺影深，用200mm光圈5.6背影已濛瀧一片，又可影花、蟲，一鏡多用，又平，但影像質數不可要求太高(我近視，睇吾清，所以冇投訴)。

[kbwong]

大致上以有决定：
sigma 70-300 apo macro super II 價錢超值，
( 1 ) CANON EF 85mm F /1.2 L USM 但未知價，
( 2 ) CANON EF 85mm F/1.8 USM，
( 1 / 2 ) 選其中枝，
在此先多謝各位師兄教導！
希望大家影多些佳作，
影得開心時買得過引！

[genewch]

Why get the unreasonably overpriced 85mm f1.2 for the marginally slightly "better" pics? It's impractical. If your products are 3R/4R pics, forget the f1.2. It doesn't help. I think the 85mm f1.8 is very very good enough to keep you happy at a friendly price. I don't have it, but it's based on my understanding.

I have the 100mm macro. Very nice to use and versatile.

[kbwong]

genewch 師兄
在此先多謝過料，
但因小弟讀書少，
明D唔明D， 可否用中文，唔好意思。