10 月 31 日 (星期五) | 會員登記|會員中心
吹水閒聊
近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 
頁數: 1共 5 回應
上個主題 :: 下個主題  
作者 訊息

yochan




註冊: 2004-04-17

上載我的肖像
題目Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 L vs 17-40mm f/4 L     Post time: 6 月 16 日

兩支想選其一,邊支好呢?
即係想問16-35mm的質素值唔值貴過17-40mm幾千蚊?
如果邊個用過以上兩支鏡,煩請給我少少意見,唔該!
Back to top

mpalex




註冊: 2002-12-27

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 L vs 17-40mm f/4 L     Post time: 6 月 16 日

which camera u use?
i use 20D, now i have 16-35
but personally i think 17-40 is better for quality
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

WingLee




註冊: 2002-12-19

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 L vs 17-40mm f/4 L     Post time: 6 月 16 日

for film 16-35 is better, for 1D & 1Ds 17-40 is better, for other Canon DSLR 16-35 is better. (For image quality only)
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Fluorite




註冊: 2005-05-17

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 L vs 17-40mm f/4 L     Post time: 6 月 16 日

Compare~
http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/canon-17-40.shtml
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

BFCY




註冊: 2003-02-10

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 L vs 17-40mm f/4 L     Post time: 6 月 16 日

I think for DSLR 17-40 should be the one because we can easily adjust the ISO up say 1600 (Canon's noise control is excellent). No need to spend double $ for one faster stop.

Also, super wide lens are usually for landscape, F2.8 is not required in most cases.

Unless you have $$$$$, that is another story.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

leohippo




註冊: 2005-06-14

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 L vs 17-40mm f/4 L     Post time: 6 月 16 日

17-40好似中間鬆wo.....
L鏡........
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top
 
頁數: 1共 5 回應
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 



 討論區列表  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password: