[peter_]

好多時睇見d好sharp好靚既相都會check check exif 睇下用乜野相機影, 發覺Canon d機影相都可以好sharp. 不過需要PS輔助(純推測)

比d人地拍的相你地睇下.

[peter_]

sorry, link 唔到d相添..

[雞能]

...好簡單lor...

CANON可以sharp, 冇話唔得...


比 "錢" 就乜都得!!!

L鏡梗sharp la!!
kit-lens?? upgrade la... 磅水咪有得sharp lor

right????

[kingkonghk]

有$大晒啦, 買碌鏡都可以大大碌

[老叟]

你講得無錯,係呢個見錢開眼既社會,有錢使得鬼推磨,何況係貪婪俗人,名譽地位嬌妻學位統統可以買到,甚至著名學府名都可以買,當然自己都可以出賣!!

[M-Freeder]

點解Zeiss同Lica仲Sharp過Nikon但好適合拍人像?

原來一個大話講得多真係會變事實架?

缺點可以講成係長處....真係好笑

[昌仔]

粒cmos限制成像sharp多過支鏡

[手套彼頓]

同意
Canon 用 CMOS 既機的確係冇咁 Sharp

[old4]

咪又係度xx啦, 成日賴CMOS / CCD.....都話咯, Canon柔Nikon Sharp呢種講法非今日才有, 菲林機時代你賴乜x CMOS?

唔好成日學台灣佬咁倒果為因!

[man1492]

"同意
Canon 用 CMOS 既機的確係冇咁 Sharp "

又唔見架nikon 8800 sharp? 又唔見架canon pro1 sharp?

[Zeiss_T]

事實上機身絕對影響成像銳利
並非賴 CMOS / CCD....
單 Jpeg 無後制下
試用下將 Nikon 舊鏡分別放上 N/C 記, 會好唔同既效果

[tam_dominic]

Zeiss T

Would like to know the result.

[man1492]

"事實上機身絕對影響成像銳利
並非賴 CMOS / CCD....
單 Jpeg 無後制下"

should use RAW.
I can only conclude that any image looked sharper than directly looking at the objects is over-sharpened. I don't think the nikon CCD could retrieve more information from my eyes as the final output from the CCD is read by human eyes and interpreted by brain.

[F14_Tomcat]

"should use RAW.
I can only conclude that any image looked sharper than directly looking at the objects is over-sharpened. I don't think the nikon CCD could retrieve more information from my eyes as the final output from the CCD is read by human eyes and interpreted by brain. "

Some food for thought:

What about contrast and saturation? Most in-cam or post processing prefers higher contrast and saturation than what's actually seen by human eyes, so that the pictures are more pleasing.

Unprocessed RAW images are mostly dull, soft, and unattractive. To what extend shall photographer post-process? Being real or attractive?

[Kenting]

我覺得係lens既property 問題因為以前film 時都有呢講法，大家用同一隻film，唔同機/鏡都唔同。我認為個image都只係經過lens再落film,that's all~所以唔太關部機事呀我覺得....