[M-Freeder]

銳利影像係一條出色鏡頭ger基本條件,Canon連做都做唔到,有乜藉口?記住, 影像數據係唔可以後期創造,需要幾Soft係攝影師責任 - 後期製作問題.相反,Canon要sharp就難,都唔夠data!
數碼時代色彩已經唔算係大問題,Photoshop已經救左Canon一瓣,CMOS又為解像力不足同coating差做掩護.......

And then記者同人像攝影師係有好大分別...人像攝影師很少使用高於ISO100,所以Canon的高ISO表現對98%人根本無意義.菲林機時代RDPIII,RAP...etc 所有d Pro Film 都係 ISO100 唔通以前唔駛影相?

Canon d 產品 ,Camera,lens, Camcorder,Scanner,Printer 一向都係一流尾二流頭,廣告就可能No.1...多ar

類似價錢要我買Canon根本無可能,唔係邊個好ger問題,係得同唔得ger問題

[M-Freeder]

人同狗有乜分別?

狗成世只學會四個字 - "狗話連編"

[lee_yat_ming]

"銳利影像係一條出色鏡頭ger基本條件,Canon連做都做唔到"
決定銳利與否的一個因素是像數:
以最高解像像度為例:
Canon:
1ds markII 4992 X 3328
20D 3504 X 2336
350D 3456 X 2304

Nikon:
D2H 2464 X 1632
D70s 3008 X 2000
D50 3008 X 2000

"And then記者同人像攝影師係有好大分別...人像攝影師很少使用高於ISO100,所以Canon的高ISO表現對98%人根本無意義."
ISO rating:
Canon: 100~1600
Nikon: 200~1600

其實, 決定相片的銳利情度, 並不能單以像數多少來作準, 它只可以作為考慮的其中一個因素.
所用的鏡頭, cmos/ccd將采集到的訊息轉擙到數碼都有影響.

另外, 即使專業攝影, 廣告攝影與新聞攝影基本要求本來就不一樣, 又怎能要一個突發記者拿著一部120去跑突發呢?

lee yat ming

[VDuck]

Obviously, the author had some problem with canon before.

There are lots of things to consider besides sharpness. And if you have the money, Canon has all the sharpness you wanted anyway.

The point about portraite photographyers. I don't know any successful one uses a 135mm in a studio anyway!! Most, if not all use medium format or large format.

I agree that Canon's products have their problems, but I'm not aware of any manufactorer make perfect products. If the author is looking for a perfect product, he should be able to find it in his/her perfect world!

[dcdvfans]

Agreed with top post!!!

even some one wants to compare D70 with 350D,one is 6M and one is 8M.beside the CCD and CMOS, you gonna check the size of imaging chip.D70 is bigger than 350D! more bigger ,more better!!


you may don't agree with my points, but you must support free speech!

[man1492]

"後期製作問題.相反,Canon要sharp就難,都唔夠data!"

How can you count the data? Compare every pixels across and obtain the standard deviation?

[mochida]

canon d機咁唔掂，點解咁多記者都仲係用canon機呢？大多數都係用1D系列，他們是白痴嗎？

[clivemilk]

Please do a research on ALL SPORT & WILDLIFE PHOTO, 9 out of 10 pros are using CANON.

Why they do that???
Are they insane!?
or u hired by NIKON!?

Have u see the noise at ISO400 / 640 / 800 / 1600 of D2H, do u thing it is sharp? it is a good camera for sport?

If the LB sensor is capable for high quality image, why Nikon use SONY cmos on D2X ar!?

If cmos sensor is no good, why SONY put so much resource on develop cmos!? and also, use it on DV!?

M-Freeder, pls make up your mind la. You join here just for "ARGUE"

[micros]

用o左 n 同 c 各有一段日子 ...... 我覺得大家都可以 sharp﹐可謂不相伯仲。
仲講咁多邊個掂邊個唔掂只係浪費時間。

[D.S]

吓,canon CMOS解像力不足?唔通NIKON D2X 果粒CMOS係假嘅?又唔明D人會話D2X解像力不足嘅?CANON咁差,我相信好多記者一定係白痴架啦,D70 IS BIGGER THAN 350D,唔奇呀,1.5x 同1.6x crop相比嘛,但又點解唔見d 出題人講1Ds markII 1x is bigger than D2X嘅?乜唔係MORE BIGGER,MORE BETTER啦咩?成日咁多投訴,train 好自己手術先講啦,手術ok,部部都係名機啦.

[D.S]

fully agree with clivemilk啦,nikon有nikon嘅好處,canon有canon嘅好處,大家買左某一個band之後唔好咁盲目,自己買左個品牌就乜都好,講野理智d pls.

[cyken]

Be honest, I had used nikkon product before but finally I decided to use canon product. The free market is equalty, why canon can occupy large ratio of the market, the reason is very simple, because good product is alwayssupported by clever comstomer. So many world photographer are using canon now.

[D.S]

仲有,唔知各位大佬有無留意來來去去攪事者都係果幾個,都係話canon這個唔掂,那樣唔好,自己喜愛某一品牌,咪自己用到佢夠囉,每人對部機都有唔同要求,你話唔sharp就係垃圾,佢話有noise就係廢機,何必要踩低別人抬高自己?那部好那部唔好,用家自己心照啦,你點講人地壞話,別人都唔會轉做同你同一部機種,只會覺得你cheap.

[uesugi]

沒有東西是完美的 @@

match for use is ok