[andyfive]

本人剛買下350D一個多月,想買新鏡頭,煩各大人給些指引.謝!!!
1) 旅行攝影用,十至十五日旅程.
2) 運動攝影用,距離主體約十米左右(日本劍道).

想知道好處及價錢(要行貨).感激非常!!!

[beancurdbean]

新人建議:
1) a) 17-85 IS
b) Kit lens + 50/1.8

2) 室內 -- 135L或小白IS, 室外 -- 小小白, 小白 或 135L

[leepsj]

Alternatively, you could try out the Sigma 55 -200mm to advance your equipment one step ahead of the kit lenses.

Original Canon 55 -200 is a bit more expensive and the build is not very solid without proper manual focus ring.

[andyfive]

多謝各大人的幫忙,但小弟唔明白50/1.8這支鏡本身冇得zoom,用作旅行可以嗎?如冇問題,這支鏡又有什麼用途呢.請求再給些指引.謝!!!

[leepsj]

50mm is a fixed lenses, for travelling it is good to shoot landscape as you could zoom in / out by moving closing or further away from the objects. Most pro use fixed lenses rather than zoom lenses la!!

[man1492]

I think the 50mm prime lens is more suitable for portraits within ten metres.

[beancurdbean]

50/1.8係定焦鏡, 所以要有standard zoom跟身 (e.g. kit lens)
它的用途在於f1.8大光圈 (zoom頂多有f2.8仲好貴)
如果手持, 室內影景, 燈光夜景, 人像特寫(淺景深) 都係一般zoom比較難做到, 加上相質比一般zoom好
兩支加埋唔使$1300, 唔使400g, 新人一流, 旅行一流
如果都係唔明或者唔想換鏡, 建議一支EFS 17-85 IS 就好易用, 旅行好夠用

[elementary user]

Andyfive,
how much $$ you can spend ar?

if you have more $$,
go trip, you may use 17-85 IS USM, about $4200, better quality,
if few $$, you may use SIGMA or Tamron 18-200mm, $2000-$3000
if no $$, you 18-55 kit lens is also ok....
If I go Trip, I will choose the lighter one............ if too heavy, ha ha ha..... you are less willing to take more photos ga~~~~~~~~~


if you want to take sports photos, i think 17-85 and 18-200 is also ok, if you are richer $$$...............
don't spend too much ar~~~~ save more $$ sin la......

but the 50mm f/1.8 is worth to buy ga, the range and the quality is good.

also, if you are 新手, i recommend you practise before you go to take 日本劍道..... because the speed to sport is very high.... 試吓D光圈要幾大.....快門要幾快先影得倒...



各位高手請指點 ^^
我都只係新手

[man1492]

"它的用途在於f1.8大光圈"

It is supposed to be but not exactly true, this lens @f/1.8 is useless. It gains acceptable sharpness at f/2.5 and demonstrates its supreme sharpness @f/4 according to my experiences.

[Philippe]

有成十米用50mm主體會好細,建議用小白IS或小白加腳架.再平啲可以考慮Sigma 70-200 f2.8.

[beancurdbean]

"It is supposed to be but not exactly true, this lens @f/1.8 is useless. It gains acceptable sharpness at f/2.5 and demonstrates its supreme sharpness @f/4 according to my experiences. "

當然知道要收光圈先靚, 但係唔係f1.8就唔用得??
有時去旅行, 乜情?到有, 腳架又欠奉, 係唔係暗到1/30s會手震都堅持唔開盡光圈??
不如你都建議?有乜鏡好d, 會有建議性d

[man1492]

"有時去旅行, 乜情?到有, 腳架又欠奉, 係唔係暗到1/30s會手震都堅持唔開盡光圈??"

No. I prefer f/2.5 @ 1/30s rather than f1.8 @ ~1/60, if you really have used that lens on 350D you will know.

For suggestion, I'll vote for the canon 85/1.8 or sigma 70-300.

[andyfive]

elementary user,
剛剛偷懶去了dc fever睇過那支sigma 18-200,真的很厲害,zoom到連頭毛都睇到,小弟非常滿意,但見光圈只得f/3.5(見回覆很多建議用f/1.8至f/2.8),不知可否應付呢?又質數及成像如何?

Philippe,
小白IS或小白太貴了(過萬蚊),另店員建議我買小小白光圈f/4.0那支,不知和那支Sigma 70-200 f2.8相比又如何呢?

煩多給些意見!!!

最後衷心多謝各方回覆

[Philippe]

andyfive, 我自己用緊Sigma 70-200, 2.8支鏡,我覺得成像好好.你可以去下面睇睇鬼佬的意見.
http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=102&sort=7&cat=37&page=1

sigma 18-200只在廣角端有f3.5.望遠端光圈是極細的,室內影運動完全唔掂.
至於小小白雖然光圈細,但因為係名門望族,價錢OK,都好多人揀,但係你影室內運動我唔係好建議.
你自己有短鏡,你可以試下在室內用f4影啲郁動物體試下夠唔夠,事實上f2.8都唔係下下得.

[winkkonglee]

55 - 200mm is not bad either!!