[jordanchan]

想請問我有SIGMA APO 70-300 F4-5.6 SUPERII,
咁好唔好再買支MINOLTA 70-210 F4？
其實成像會唔會差唔多？我係用D5D的,謝謝.

[bigbee]

Sure MINOLTA 70-210 F4!

[kingkonghk]

range重複左咁囉, 你唔介意買左70-210之後是但唔用其中一支都值得買

[peterchan04]

賣左 sigma
買 minolta + 1.4x tele converter.

一係就 吾變.

[kingkonghk]

買得1.4不如加錢買碌鏡好過, 100-400apo都係4k幾, 個1.4x都成2k啦, 我估, 又要裝拆, 又影響光圈, 又影響對焦, 我自己就奶左野...掉埋一邊算

[chaahc]

sure 70-210 f4 啦 ...
sigma 個支只係 normal ... 而 70-210 f4 二手價+性能比 = perfect
70-210 f4 衰在無 apo 咋 ... 如果唔係 g 鏡都做得 !

[plcleung]

Minolta 70-210mm f/4 although has no 'APO' label, it provides sharp & vivid colour image for portraits. Its colour tone is similar to Leica lenses.
I found it has execellent performance on both SLF & DSLF. If you can find a 2nd hand item, buy it immediately.

[patrickns01]

枝70-210 f4 咁正, 不過都好難揾, 咁枝 70-210 f4.5 - 5.6 又如何? 我見有二手喎, 不過都要成千五蚊.....

[chaahc]

70-210 F 4.5 - 5.6 千祈唔好買... 買完支鏡會即刻變二手比你賣返出去
搵唔到 70-210 f 4 可以試下 支 70-210 f 3.5- 4.5 .. 呢支都幾好 ...
差過 f 4 少少 ... 去松屋 睇下啦 ... 600 -700 $ 度啦

[patrickns01]

乜原來70-210 有咁多枝架, 咁我唔知有冇睇錯啦, 但係要成$1500喎....
另外我見第二間有枝二手80-200 f4.5 賣$500 , 枝鏡好細枝的, 唔知呢枝得唔得?我而家諗緊呢枝同埋75-300 f4.5-5.6 or sigma 70-300 apo marco , 各位有冇咩意見? thx
另外想問下chaahc 兄, 松屋係邊架? 好多minolta 鏡買架?

[Mark K]

JordanChan

70-210/4 is one of the best Minolta lenses. It is relatively small and compact comparing to the f/2.8 sibling and yet it produces the best optical quality at very low price

Sigma's 75-300 provides uncompromised image quality and convenient range.

If you don't mind then keep them both

[jordanchan]

多謝各位的意見,本人剛從一網友買入一支70-210 f4,
鏡身有少花,鏡片冇花冇霉,成像不錯,手感好個支SIGMA好多,謝謝.